Ethical Implications of Quality-Adjusted Life Year Assessments for Patients with Disabilities: A Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy Case Study

Author(s)

Klimchak AC1, Sedita L1, Gooch KL1, Malone DC2
1Sarepta Therapeutics, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA, 2University of Utah, College of Pharmacy, Salt Lake City, UT, USA

OBJECTIVES:

Quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) are traditionally used to assess the value of treatments, but have been questioned for individuals with disabilities, particularly when there is an inability to achieve high utilities compared with healthier individuals. Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a progressive genetic neuromuscular disease, resulting in loss of ambulation (LOA) by early teenage years and premature mortality. LOA results in diminished health utility; however, early non-ambulatory phase maintenance of upper body function allows individuals to retain a high degree of independence and participate in daily activities. Current DMD therapies are approved regardless of ambulatory status and aim to slow disease progression. This study assesses the impact of a QALY assessment focusing on the maximum treatment cost of a hypothetical treatment for non-ambulatory patients with DMD.

METHODS:

The Institute for Clinical and Economic Review’s 2019 DMD model was replicated and adapted for early non-ambulatory patients. The base case assessed a 13-year-old early non-ambulatory patient. Assumptions regarding utilities (0.21 at baseline [early non-ambulatory] progressing to 0.18 [late non-ambulatory]), health-state transitions, costs, and treatment benefits (10-, 20-, and 40-year pause in disease progression) were replicated per the published report. Assessments included maximum cost-effective treatment cost at willingness-to-pay thresholds of $50,000/QALY, $100,000/QALY, and $150,000/QALY.

RESULTS:

At $100,000/QALY or less, net non-treatment costs exceeded treatment benefits, implying no cost-effectiveness of any treatment, irrespective of the amount of benefit, even at a $0 treatment cost. At $150,000/QALY, annual maximum treatment costs ranged from $260–$430, which is less than the annual maximum treatment cost of generic prednisone ($550).

CONCLUSIONS:

These results support previously described concerns regarding QALY assessments for individuals with disabilities. Low baseline health-state utility values for early non-ambulatory patients, who still maintain upper body function and independence, have a substantial and concerning impact on QALY value assessments of DMD treatments.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE291

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Health Disparities & Equity

Disease

Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×