Real-World Economic Burden of Illicit-Use Opioid Overdose with and without Respiratory Comorbidity in Patients Not on Medication for Opioid Use Disorder

Author(s)

Changolkar A1, Owens G2, Sindhwani MK2
1Emergent BioSolutions, Philadelphia, PA, USA, 2Emergent BioSolutions, Gaithersburg, MD, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Evaluate economic burden among Illicit-use opioid overdose patients with and without respiratory comorbidity not on medication for opioid use disorder (MOUD).

METHODS: This retrospective analysis used anonymized Commercial, Managed Medicare, and Medicaid patient claims from the US Optum database. Illicit-use opioid overdose patients without an opioid prescription, with respiratory co-morbidity (RIOP) and without (IOP) in the pre-index period between Jan 2016–Dec 2019 were identified. Patients >18 years at index, with a minimum continuous enrollment of 365 days pre- and 365 days post-index event date were included. Patients on MOUD treatment prior to the index period were identified and excluded. RIOP and IOP by insurance, on naloxone, state, comorbidities, and costs were analyzed.

RESULTS: 845 RIOP and 5,633 IOP were identified. Overall, 61.30% of RIOP were >50 years, 51.36% female, 56.45% Caucasian, and 68.28% had Medicaid. States with the highest RIOP included NJ (14.56%), MD (8.28%), TN (7.81%), OH (7.22%), and NY (6.51%). Overall, 73.92% of IOP were <50 years, 60.59% male, 62.38% Caucasian, and 76.07% had Medicaid. States with the highest IOP included NJ (12.87%), OH (11.54%), MD (10.74%), PA (6.73%), and TN (6.30%). The average index event costs and Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score for RIOP and IOP were $7,280.79 vs. $4,502.22 and 2.60 vs. 0.77, respectively. Index event costs with and without naloxone for RIOP were $2,489.72 vs. $7,771.33 and for IOP $2,026.95 vs. $4792.62, respectively. Based on conservative estimates, the cost difference in treating 100,000 RIOP and 100,000 IOP with or without naloxone demonstrated annual plan savings of ~$528 and ~$276 million, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: With the higher CCI scores, RIOP had higher costs. Both RIOP and IOP demonstrated significant economic burden, while naloxone recipients had lower costs. Future research should explore naloxone co-prescribing benefits among these patients.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE416

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Budget Impact Analysis

Disease

Mental Health

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×