Citizens' Thoughts about Implantable Medical Devices: Results of a Cross-Sectional Survey Among the General Population in Hungary

Author(s)

Péntek M1, Hölgyesi Á2, Tóth B1, Kozlovszky M1, Kuti J1, Weszl M3, Czere J1, Baji P4, Kovács L1, Gulácsi L1, Zrubka Z5
1Óbuda University, Budapest, Hungary, 2Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary, 3Semmelweis University, Budapest, PE, Hungary, 4University of Bristol, Bristol, UK, 5Óbuda University, Budapest, PE, Hungary

OBJECTIVES: The Medical Device Regulation (MDR 2017/745) has raised the regulatory bar in terms of the required extent of clinical evidence for medical devices. We aimed to assess citizens’ knowledge on the authorisation of implantable medical devices (IMDs) to better understand the social context in which the MDR has to be implemented.

METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey was performed (year 2021) involving a sample of 1400 individuals (53.7% females) aged 40+, representative for the Hungarian general population. Health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L) and digital health literacy (eHEALS) were assessed. Participants’ thoughts regarding IMD authorisation, data processing and security were explored with six questions (‘What do you think...‘; ‘yes’/’no’ responses). Descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons for statistical differences were performed.

RESULTS: The average (SD) age was 58.3 (11.1 years), EQ-5D-5L index was 0.83 (0.26) and eHEALS score was 28.1 (5.8). The share of ‘yes’ responses were: all IMDs are authorised after clinical trials such as the drugs: 84.7%; all IMDs have a unique identifier linked to the wearing person’s data: 80.0%; patients with IMD are entered in a registry where their details are recorded: 84.6%; some IMDs send patient data to an authorised electronic database: 72.7%; electronic IMDs sending patient data are subject to security and privacy control: 71.8%; electronic IMDs could be subject to a cyber-attack: 56.2%. Participants with higher educational level and eHEALS score indicated significantly (p<0.05) more ’yes’ responses, except the ‘patient registry’ and ’cyber-attack’ questions, respectively. Citizens living with any IMD (N=433, 30.9%) indicated significantly (p<0.05) more ‘yes’ on the ‘patient registry’ question.

CONCLUSIONS: This first explorative survey revealed an overestimation of the regulatory control over IMDs and strong cyber-security concerns among the public. Educational programmes are suggested to improve citizens’ knowledge on IMDs, and to put personal data protection and cyber-security issues into a realistic perspective.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

MT26

Topic

Medical Technologies

Topic Subcategory

Medical Devices

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×