Advantages of Visualizing Net Loss Curves in Cost Effectiveness Analyses: An Example Comparing Opioid Use Disorder Treatment Alternatives

Author(s)

Beaulieu E1, Rittenhouse B2
1Harvard Medical School and Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA, 2MCPHS University, Winchester, MA, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Within cost effectiveness analyses (CEAs), descriptions of decision uncertainty often rely on cost effectiveness acceptability curves (CEACs) which report the probability that each alternative is cost-effective. An extension of decision uncertainty analysis in the form of net loss curves, as described in seminal contributions to the literature by Eckermann, offers distinct advantages to also inform the magnitude of losses if a sub-optimal alternative is selected. We demonstrate the advantage of net loss curves in an example of a CEA examining treatment alternatives for opioid use disorder (OUD).

METHODS: We perform a probabilistic sensitivity analysis for a CEA comparing office-based methadone (MO), clinic-based methadone (MC), and office-base buprenorphine (BO) to treat patients with OUD. We report not only the probability of alternatives’ cost effectiveness via the CEAC but also quantify and report, across a range of willingness to pay (WTP) thresholds, the per-patient net loss that is incurred conditional on the adoption of each respective treatment alternative.

RESULTS: Given a WTP of $7,000 per additional patient retained in six-month treatment (based on previous publications), MO has the lowest expected net loss at $230/patient, followed by MC at $334/patient and BO at $1,255/patient. Choice of a non-optimal alternative (MC or BO) thus implies losses of $104 or $1,025, respectively per patient - and much larger in aggregate.

CONCLUSIONS: Net loss curves illustrate the substantial additional net loss associated with choosing alternatives other than MO, particularly BO. This example demonstrates the potential for net loss curves to serve as an impactful visualization tool to emphasize the value of the cost-effective alternative over ranges of WTP by quantifying the magnitude of consequences when implementing suboptimal alternatives. This quantification of consequences is absent when the analysis is limited to CEACs; thus, net loss curves serve to build a stronger case for the cost-effective alternative.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

EE234

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation, Thresholds & Opportunity Cost, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×