Comparative Efficacy of Bimekizumab for the Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Network Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Armstrong A1, Reich K2, Warren RB3, Taieb V4, Fahrbach K5, Kazmierska P6, Betts M5, Neupane B5, Kiri S7, Gordon K8
1Keck School of Medicine (USC), Dermatology, Los Angeles, CA, USA, 2Center for Translational Research in Inflammatory Skin Diseases, Institute for Health Services Research in Dermatology and Nursing, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany, 3Dermatology Centre, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester NIHR Biomedical Research Centre, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK, 4UCB Pharma, Slough, UK, 5Evidera, Waltham, MA, USA, 6Evidera, London, LON, UK, 7UCB Pharma, Slough, SLG, UK, 8Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-17A and IL-17F. The objective was to perform a network meta-analysis (NMA) to assess the relative short-term clinical efficacy of bimekizumab versus other approved treatments for plaque psoriasis (PSO).

METHODS: A systematic literature review (SLR) was carried out in July 2020 to identify randomized controlled trials of biologics (anti-IL-17, anti-IL-23, anti-IL-12/23, anti-tumor necrosis factor [TNF] alpha), small molecules and conventional systemic agents. Results from four phase 3/3b trials of bimekizumab in PSO (not identified by the SLR) were included. The key efficacy measure was PASI (Psoriasis Area Severity Index), expressed as the proportion of patients achieving a x% reduction from baseline to the primary endpoint of included studies (which ranged between 10-16 weeks). A Bayesian multinomial probit baseline risk-adjusted random effects model with no assumption that all treatments ranked the same across PASI response levels was used. Treatment ranks were based on the surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs).

RESULTS: 85 studies and 23 comparators were included in the NMA. Bimekizumab was the highest ranked treatment for PASI75, PASI90 and PASI100, with response probabilities of 92.9%, 85.1% and 59.5% respectively. Risankizumab and ixekizumab were the next best ranked treatments for PASI75 (PASI75: 90.0% and 90.1%; PASI90: 73.3% and 72.9%; PASI100: 42.5% and 40.6%, respectively). Bimekizumab had a higher response rate than all other treatments for PASI90 and PASI100, with an average probability of being better than every other comparator of greater than 99.9%.

CONCLUSIONS: This NMA indicated bimekizumab was the highest ranked treatment in terms of efficacy. Estimated PASI response rates were consistent with observed phase 3 clinical trial data; these data confirm the potential utility of bimekizumab for the treatment of moderate to severe PSO.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2021-05, ISPOR 2021, Montreal, Canada

Value in Health, Volume 24, Issue 5, S1 (May 2021)

Code

PBI3

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Biologics and Biosimilars, No Specific Disease

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×