USE OF REAL-WORLD DATA AND MACHINE LEARNING TO REDUCE TREATMENT-LIMITING ADVERSE EVENTS IN AN ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA CLINICAL TRIAL POPULATION

Author(s)

Buderi R1, Ransom J2, Galaznik A3, Berger M4
1Medidata Solutions, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2AcornAI, a Medidata Company, Boston, MA, USA, 3Medidata Solutions, Belmont, MA, USA, 4Self Employed, New York, NY, USA

OBJECTIVES :

Acute Myeloid Leukemia is an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis despite significant efforts to identify new therapies. Adverse events can account for 24-47% of clinical trial discontinuation1. In this study we leverage real-world data and machine learning approaches to identify patient-level predictors of common adverse events in AML patients. We then validate the model’s accuracy in a clinical trial population to evaluate its potential utility for improving clinical trial conduct and helping patients avoid adverse events.

METHODS

De-identified Oncology Electronic Medical Record (EMR) data was used from the Guardian Research Network™ (GRN) of integrated delivery systems from Jan 1990 – July 2018. Pooled trial patients with relapsed/refractory AML were from Medidata Enterprise Data Store from March 2008 - Nov 20173. All data sets were converted into the OMOP Common Data Model, v5. Analyses were conducted in SHYFT Quantum v7.1.1 and Python 3.6. All subjects had at least 180 days pre- and post-index activity, indexed at initiation of most recent chemotherapy regimen. Rates were calculated for adverse events commonly associated with treatment discontinuation – neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia and pneumonia2. Features included, but were not limited to, age, gender, current and prior chemotherapy, prior stem cell transplant, and support medications. Predictors were assessed using multiple machine learning algorithms (Logistic Regression, Gradient Boosted Classification, Random Forest, and XGBoost Classification). A 3:1 training/test split and cross validation scoring with a K-fold of 6 was employed. Model performance was measured by AUC ROC scores, PPV and NPV.

RESULTS

For EMR-derived models, AUC scores were 0.60-0.75 for top performing models. Testing in clinical trial data had somewhat lower performance, with AUC’s .56-.61. Best performance was seen in models for neutropenia.

CONCLUSIONS

Real-world data and machine learning can assess risk of potentially treatment-limiting adverse events, with potential applications for reducing clinical trial discontinuation and managing patient treatment burden

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PCN285

Topic

Epidemiology & Public Health, Methodological & Statistical Research

Topic Subcategory

Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Predictive Analytics, Safety & Pharmacoepidemiology

Disease

Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×