A CANADIAN NETWORK META-ANALYSIS OF THE EFFICACY OF HALOBETASOL PROPIONATE (0.01%) AND TAZAROTENE (0.045%) FIXED COMBINATION RELATIVE TO OTHER TOPICAL THERAPIES AMONG PATIENTS WITH MODERATE TO SEVERE PLAQUE PSORIASIS
Author(s)
Lozano-Ortega G1, Rogula B2, Gaudet V3, Mickle A2, Johnston K2, Barbeau M3
1Broadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Burnaby, BC, Canada, 2Broadstreet Health Economics & Outcomes Research, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 3Bausch Health, Canada Inc., Laval, QC, Canada
OBJECTIVES : Plaque psoriasis is undertreated in Canada, with some severely-affected patients receiving no treatment at all. Halobetasol propionate (0.01%) and tazarotene (0.045%) (HP/TAZ) is the first topical combination therapy in a once-daily lotion formulation of corticosteroid/retinoid that has demonstrated efficacy and safety in two pivotal randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To inform Canadian submissions for reimbursement, a network meta-analysis (NMA) was undertaken to determine the efficacy of HP/TAZ fixed combination relative to other topical therapies among patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. METHODS : The NMA was informed by a systematic literature review that identified RCTs published between Jan-2000 and Oct-2019 of topical therapies approved in Canada for the management of plaque psoriasis (very high potency corticosteroids [VHPC], vitamin D analogues [VDA], betamethasone dipropionate/calcipotriol (BD/VDA), high potency corticosteroids [HPC], and tazarotene [TAZ]). Studies that had at least 70% of patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis and had reported treatment success (“clear” or “almost clear” score in the Investigator Global Assessment [IGA] or equivalent scale) were included in the NMA. Efficacy was evaluated at 8 weeks as this was the treatment duration in the HP/TAZ RCTs. A random effects models was selected a priori. RESULTS : Fourteen studies contributed evidence to the NMA; no evidence was identified for HPC. With respect to vehicle, the relative risk (RR) of achieving treatment success was 4.3 (95% credible interval: 3.2, 5.5) for HP/TAZ; 4.2 (3.3, 5.2) for BD/VDA; 3.2 (2.5, 4.0) for VHPC; 1.9 (1.6, 2.4) for VDA; and 1.7 (0.8, 3.2) for TAZ. HP/TAZ and BD/VDA credible intervals were overlapping. The between-study standard deviation was 0.2 (0.0, 0.5). CONCLUSIONS : Evidence suggests that HP/TAZ is more efficacious than topical monotherapies currently used in Canada. Based on this study’s findings, HP/TAZ’s efficacy is similar to that of BD/VDA and it provides a new important and needed treatment option for a currently undermanaged patient population.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)
Code
PSS2
Topic
Clinical Outcomes
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Sensory System Disorders