A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF THE HUMANISTIC BURDEN OF FLT3-MUTATED RELAPSED/REFRACTORY ACUTE MYELOID LEUKEMIA
Author(s)
Casamayor M1, Gubbels L2, Garnham A3, Shah MV4
1IQVIA, Barcelona, Spain, 2IQVIA, Amsterdam, NH, Netherlands, 3Clear Health Economics, London, UK, 4Astellas Pharma, Inc., Northbrook, IL, USA
OBJECTIVES: Although FLT3 mutations are common in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), their impact on patients’ health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is unclear. In order to inform health economic analyses of gilteritinib—a targeted therapy for FLT3-mutated (FLT3mut+) relapsed or refractory (R/R) AML—a systematic literature review (SLR) regarding the humanistic burden was conducted to identify data on HRQoL in R/R AML. METHODS: Embase, MEDLINE, MEDLINE In-Process, and Cochrane databases were searched from inception to September 2019 using terms related to R/R AML, HRQoL, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). ClinicalTrials.gov and selected conference proceedings were also reviewed. Studies of any design were included if they reported HRQoL or other PROs for adults with R/R AML treated with current standard of care, gilteritinib, or products in phase 3 development. RESULTS: Of the 452 unique publications identified, 10 publications from seven studies were included in the SLR: one phase 3 randomized controlled trial (gilteritinib; ADMIRAL), three cross-sectional studies, one phase 1 non-randomized study, one observational study, and one qualitative study. Study populations differed, with studies recruiting either patients with R/R AML only or both newly diagnosed and R/R AML. ADMIRAL was the only study that reported data for FLT3mut+ R/R AML and was the only study to compare the HRQoL of patients treated with specific therapies. Although studies administered different PRO instruments, all highlighted the negative impact of R/R AML on HRQoL, which is typically worse than that of de novo AML. No study compared the humanistic burden of FLT3mut+ and FLT3 wild‑type R/R AML. CONCLUSIONS: This SLR highlighted the lack of published evidence regarding the humanistic burden of R/R AML. Only seven studies met the inclusion criteria and only one study (ADMIRAL) focused on patients with FLT3mut+ R/R AML. Further research is therefore required to inform health economic analyses in FLT3mut+ R/R AML.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)
Code
PCN36
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinician Reported Outcomes, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Drugs, Oncology