Preparing for the EU Regulation on HTA and Joint Clinical Assessments of Vaccines

Author(s)

Largeron N1, D'Agostino P2, Curran D3, Dankó D4, Eskola J5, Godfroid P6, Hanley R7, de Pouvourville G8, Postma MJ9, Puig-Barberà J10, de Waure C11, Schmitt J12, Vicere' A13, Beck E14
1Sanofi, Lyon, 69, France, 2CSL Seqirus, Munich, Germany, 3GSK, Wavre, Belgium, 4Ideas & Solutions, Budapest, Hungary, 5National Institute for Health and Wellfare, Helsinki, Finland, 6Janssen pharmaceutical companies of Johnson & Johnson, Diegem, Belgium, 7Takeda Pharmaceuticals International AG, Zürich, Switzerland, 8ESSEC Business School, Cergy Pontoise, France, 9University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands, 10FISABIO (Fundación para el Fomento de la Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de la Comunitat Valenciana), Valencia, Spain, 11University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy, 12Global Health Press, Singapore, Singapore, 13Vaccines Europe, Brussels, VOV, Belgium, 14Moderna, Inc., Cambridge, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Clinical assessment of vaccines in the European Union (EU) significantly variates compared to other medicines, involving many different bodies and processes – most notably the National Immunization Advisory Technical Groups (NITAGs). To help inform the development of standardized and vaccine-specific evaluation for use in the EU Regulation on Health Technology Assessment (HTA), literature reviews and expert consultation were conducted to identify current practices and gaps related to vaccine appraisals and to develop guiding principles for the clinical appraisal of vaccines.

METHODS: Three complementary literature reviews were conducted to capture the current guidelines and recommendations for vaccine appraisals, identify methods used to assess evidence and outline the differences in recommendations for four selected vaccines. An expert consultation meeting was held to discuss the literature review findings, reflect on vaccine-specific considerations in the assessment of clinical domains of HTA and obtain insights into the EU’s future joint clinical assessments (JCAs) of vaccines.

RESULTS: Significant variation exists across the EU in the decision-making processes and criteria for vaccines clinical evaluation with vaccine specificities being rarely considered by HTA bodies across EU member states. Based on literature review findings and expert recommendations, three guiding principles (use of appropriate terminology and measurements for vaccines, vaccine-specific assessment process, data collection and evidence generation) and thirteen recommendations were proposed to foster development of standardized and vaccine-specific evaluation framework and facilitate the successful implementation of the EU Regulation on HTA for vaccines.

CONCLUSIONS: The review of the literature and discussion with experts raised concerns that JCAs for vaccines may not be able to appropriately capture the full value of vaccination, with the risk of delaying or limiting population access to vaccines. Guiding principles were proposed to help addressing vaccines-specificities under the EU Regulation on HTA - before it becomes effective in 2025.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

HTA261

Topic

Health Technology Assessment

Topic Subcategory

Decision & Deliberative Processes, Systems & Structure, Value Frameworks & Dossier Format

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Vaccines

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×