Cost per Responder Analysis Comparing Adagrasib and Sotorasib in Patients With KRAS G12C-Mutated Previously Treated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)

Author(s)

Berardi A1, Laurie M2, Theriou C1, Orsini I1, Bouwmeester W1, Gao S2, Korytowsky B2
1PRECISIONheor, London, LON, UK, 2Mirati Therapeutics, San Diego, CA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Adagrasib, a novel oral KRAS G12C inhibitor, demonstrated an objective response rate (ORR) of 42.9% in the KRYSTAL-1 Phase 2 trial, among patients with advanced/metastatic KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC previously treated with chemoimmunotherapy (FDA approval in December-2022).

Sotorasib, another KRAS G12C inhibitor, demonstrated an ORR of 37.1% in the Phase 2 trial CodeBreaK100 (FDA approval in May-2021) and 28.1% in the Phase 3 randomized trial, CodeBreaK200.

No head-to-head clinical trials comparing adagrasib and sotorasib are available. A cost-effectiveness model was developed to compare expected cost per response between adagrasib and sotorasib.

METHODS: The ORRs and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics between KRYSTAL-1 and CodeBreaK200 using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs). Sensitivity analysis using CodeBreaK100 was assessed. The analysis included only Grade ≥ 3 TRAEs occurring in ≥5% patients. Treatment-related direct medical costs were incorporated: drug acquisition, monitoring and TRAE management. Treatment costs for adagrasib and sotorasib were based on wholesale acquisition costs, median treatment duration times (5.7 and 4.6 months) and relative drug intensity (76.5 and 89.2%), as observed in clinical trials.

RESULTS: The MAIC increased the ORR odds ratio from 1.92 (95%CI 1.16-3.17) to 2.22 (95%CI 1.25-3.96). Adjusted ORR of adagrasib was higher than sotorasib (46.5% vs 28.1%). Treatment costs were comparable ($100,135 adagrasib; $102,502 sotorasib); main cost differentiators were drug acquisition and TRAE management costs (both favoring adagrasib). The cost to achieve one response was $215,451 for adagrasib and $364,774 for sotorasib, resulting in $149,323 saved per response achieved. The number needed to treat to achieve one additional response was 5.44, meaning one additional response is expected when treating 5 patients with adagrasib instead of sotorasib.

CONCLUSIONS: At a similar cost, adagrasib is a more effective and cost-efficient option compared to sotorasib for achieving ORR in patients with previously treated KRAS G12C-mutated NSCLC.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE357

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×