Costs and Health Impact of Wastewater Surveillance to Guide Respiratory Syncytial Virus Prophylaxis in Canada, Compared to Clinical Surveillance
Author(s)
Thampi N1, Mercier E1, Paes B2, Edwards J3, Rodgers-Gray B4, Delatolla R1
1University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada, 2McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada, 3Violicom Medical Limited, Reading, UK, 4Violicom Medical Limited, EASTLEIGH, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To compare wastewater surveillance- (WWS) versus clinical surveillance (CS)-guided respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) prophylaxis programs in Ontario, Canada.
METHODS: A cost-consequence model was developed that considered all infants aged <6 months at the start of the RSV season and eligible for nirsevimab prophylaxis. The RSV season was determined to start one month earlier using WWS than CS and, in both scenarios, lasted for 5 months. Nirsevimab efficacy at preventing RSV-related hospitalizations (RSVH), medically-attended emergency room/outpatient RSV infections (MARI) and subsequent respiratory morbidity (RM) was adjusted in the CS scenario by having one month at the no-prophylaxis rate (to reflect a one-month delay in timing of prophylaxis initiation versus WWS). The RSVH rate was 0.6% for WWS versus 0.8% for CS in prophylaxed infants (no prophylaxis: 1.6%). Assuming that RSV-WWS was added to an existing provincial WWS system, the cost was budgeted at $76,840/year, whereas for setting-up a new system, the cost was $1.47m in the first year and $810,560 in subsequent years. For CS, no additional costs were assumed. Other costs considered included (equivalent for both WWS and CS): nirsevimab ($952.28 for 50/100g vials + $14.37 nurse administration); RSVH episode ($8,353); intensive care unit episode ($5,747); MARI episode ($91-337); and RM episode/year ($1,116). All costs are in 2022 Canadian dollars.
RESULTS: Of 136,571 annual Ontario live births, 124,728 infants were estimated to be <6 months at the start of the RSV season and thereby eligible for nirsevimab prophylaxis. Compared to CS, WWS was associated with savings of $2.1-3.5m in the first year and $13.7-16.6m over 1-3 years (Table). WWS-guided prophylaxis resulted in 249 fewer RSVHs and 950 fewer MARIs per year versus CS-guided prophylaxis.
CONCLUSIONS: WWS has the potential to more accurately detect the start of the pediatric RSV season, which could significantly increase the effectiveness of prophylaxis programs while saving healthcare costs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE182
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Infectious Disease (non-vaccine), Pediatrics