A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis (CEA) of Adjuvant Nivolumab for Patients With Resected Esophageal Cancer (EC) or Gastroesophageal Junction Cancer (GEJC) in France

Author(s)

Casabianca P1, Massetti M2, Cotte FE1, Moreau R3, Kassahun S4, Singh P5, Kim I5, Gaudin AF1, Leleu H3
1Bristol-Myers Squibb, Rueil-Malmaison, France, 2Public Health Expertise, PARIS, 75, France, 3Public Health Expertise, Paris, France, 4Bristol Myers Squibb Ltd., Uxbridge, UK, 5Bristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ, USA

OBJECTIVES: EC/GEJC has a poor prognosis with < 50% of patients with advanced disease surviving at 1 year. Our objective was to determine the cost-effectiveness of adjuvant nivolumab versus current clinical practice (surveillance) in patients with EC/GEJC who have residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by complete resection.

METHODS: Compliant with French Commission for Economic Evaluations and Public Health (CEESP) guidelines, a simplified four-state semi-Markov model was applied with four states: pre-recurrence, locoregional-recurrence, distant-recurrence, and death. Pre- to post-recurrence transition was informed by the time-to-recurrence (TTR) distribution of CheckMate 577 patients with locoregional and distant recurrence. Registry data informed overall survival (OS) after each recurrence type because CheckMate 577 lacks mature OS. A 15-year time horizon simulated population-matched patients included in the trial. Costs and outcomes were discounted 2.5% per year. Robustness of results was evaluated with probabilistic sensitivity analyses (PSA) and scenarios.

RESULTS: Nivolumab was associated with an incremental cost of 48,634€ and incremental QALY gain of 0.98 compared with current clinical practice, resulting in an incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of 49,572€/QALY. Alternative assumptions had limited impact: a maximum 26% ICUR increase at 10-year time horizon; 21% ICUR decrease with a TTR extrapolation simulating pseudo-cure after 6 years; and negligeable impact (−0.1%) using a 3 health-state semi-Markov structure (pre-recurrence, post-recurrence, and death). PSA confirmed base-case ICUR with 80% probability of nivolumab being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of €75,000/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS: CEESP accepted this CEA methodology, only criticizing the choice of a constant hazard ratio for post-recurrence survival. Compared with previously evaluated and accepted CEA for immune-checkpoint inhibitors in a metastatic setting, ICUR appears particularly low because of capped treatment duration for nivolumab (1-year stopping rule) and longer pre-recurrence survival associated with quality of life-benefits.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE630

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation

Disease

SDC: Oncology, STA: Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×