Comparison of Three Indirect Overall Survival (OS) Modeling Approaches in Predicting Long-Term OS Benefit in Randomized Controlled Trials: A Case Study From the Relativity-047 Study
Author(s)
Baker T1, Kendall R1, McDonald L2, Moshyk A3, May JR2, Hamilton M3, Kurt M3
1ICON plc, New York, NY, USA, 2Bristol Myers Squibb, Uxbridge, UK, 3Bristol Myers Squibb, Lawrenceville, NJ, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Overall survival (OS) is essential in cost-effectiveness analyses; however, it may not be available from the initial database-locks (DBLs) of a randomized trial. This research compared predicted long-term mean OS gains between the arms of the phase 3 RELATIVITY-047 study (nivolumab [NIVO]+relatlimab [RELA] versus NIVO) obtained from extrapolated OS using reported trial data and from three approaches indirectly modeling OS from progression free survival (PFS).
METHODS: Initial DBL for RELATIVITY-047 study only reported PFS, whereas the successive DBL reported both PFS and OS. Two indirect approaches employed a semi-Markov model to estimate the OS for both arms of the study using the estimated post-progression survival from the NIVO arm of CheckMate 067 study assuming similar subsequent treatment patterns between the trials and the two arms of RELATIVITY-047. The third approach predicted OS through a surrogacy relationship between PFS-OS and extrapolated OS for NIVO from CheckMate 067. All indirect approaches used PFS data from the initial DBL of RELATIVITY-047. OS data from the trial was extrapolated using parametric models and adjusted with background mortality to generate a benchmark for the indirect methods. Projections over a time horizon of 40 years were compared.
RESULTS: Lognormal and gamma distributions were used to extrapolate OS data for NIVO+RELA and NIVO from RELATIVITY-047, respectively. Mean OS gain with NIVO+RELA versus NIVO was estimated as 3.1 years using reported trial data and ranged between 1.1-1.8 years using the indirect methods. As a sensitivity analysis, shortening the time-horizon to 30-years for projections only slightly affected the underestimation margins of mean OS gain by indirect methods (2.9 years with reported trial data versus 1.1-1.7 years with indirect methods).
CONCLUSIONS: This case study showed that in the absence of reported OS data from a trial, indirect methods can be conservative options for subsequent cost-effectiveness analyses by underestimating underlying long-term mean survival benefit.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
MSR103
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Methodological & Statistical Research
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes
Disease
SDC: Oncology