EQ-5D Analysis in Patients with Insomnia: Change of Quality of Life in Lemborexant Phase 3 Trial Sunrise 1
Author(s)
Ikeda S1, Azuma M2, Fujimoto K3, Shibahara H4, Inoue S4, Moline M5, Ishii M2
1International University of Health and Welfare, Chiba, Japan, 2Eisai Co,. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan, 3Eisai Co,. Ltd., koishikawa, Japan, 4CRECON Medical Assessment Inc., Tokyo, Japan, 5Eisai, Inc, Woodcliff Lake, NJ, USA
OBJECTIVES Untreated insomnia can lead to daytime fatigue and poor quality of life (QOL). This study assessed the changes in QOL at one month from baseline, using EQ-5D-3L collected in the SUNRISE-1 Phase-3 study of lemborexant, a dual-orexin-receptor-antagonist approved for the treatment of insomnia. METHODS Subjects were randomized to treatment with lemborexant-10mg (LEM10, n=269), 5mg (LEM5, n=266), placebo (n=208), or zolpidem extended-release 6.25mg (ZOL-ER, n=263). Responders on patient-reported (subjective), sleep diary-based sleep onset latency (sSOL) were defined as sSOL ≤20minutes at the end of one month of treatment, provided their baseline sSOL was >30minutes. Subjects did not have to meet criteria for sleep onset insomnia in this study. Exclusion criteria for the EQ-5D analysis: did not meet baseline criteria of sSOL>30minutes (n=230), missing sleep data (n=53), fall during the study (n=4), and/or missing EQ-5D data (n=19). EQ-5D-3L data were scored to QOL scores (utility values) using UK tariffs. ANCOVA detected the difference of QOL score changes from baseline between responder and non-responder groups using age, sex, baseline QOL scores, and comorbidities of depression or anxiety disorder histories as covariates. RESULTS Seven-hundred-and-three subjects were eligible for EQ-5D analysis with n=36, 44, 15, and 21 for LEM10, LEM5, placebo, and ZOL-ER in responder group, and n=143, 151, 125, and 168 in non-responder group, respectively, after the exclusions. Mean baseline QOL scores (SD) were 0.904 (0.157) in responder and 0.900 (0.154) in non-responder group. Increments of QOL scores from the baseline were 0.026 larger in responder group compared with non-responder group with no statistical significance (p=0.068). The subjects who were older, had higher baseline QOL score and had histories of depression tended to have lower QOL score changes (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS Subjects who responded to the treatments for insomnia had larger improvement of QOL than those without responses, and the QOL increments were estimated 0.026 based on sSOL.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2020-11, ISPOR Europe 2020, Milan, Italy
Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue S2 (December 2020)
Code
PMH8
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Health State Utilities
Disease
Drugs, Mental Health