Improved Estimations Of Cost-Effectiveness For Ovarian Cancer

Published May 17, 2013
High Wycombe, UK - Improvements in ovarian cancer survival rates have been modest with a median survival after recurrence of just two years. Patients with disease relapsing more than six months after completion of a platinum chemotherapy regimen are said to have platinum-sensitive disease, where a host of platinum and non-platinum alternatives are considered. Final survival results have become available for trabectedin plus PLDH in the treatment of relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. A study, “Cost-Effectiveness of Trabectedin Plus Pegylated Liposomal Doxorubicin for the Treatment of Women with Relapsed Platinum-Sensitive Ovarian Cancer in the UK: Analysis Based on the Final Survival Data of the OVA-301 Trial,” published in Value in Health, is the first study to estimate the costs and QALYs of treatment based on the final survival data, and is therefore critical to inform accurate estimations of cost-effectiveness. Survival analysis showed that adjusting for imbalances in prognostic factors including the time between platinum regimen initiation and relapse (also known as the platinum-free interval) significantly improved goodness-of-fit when estimating average patient survival time. Results from the decision analytic model improved survival with trabectedin plus PLDH compared to PLDH alone, and an ICER of £38,026 per QALY. This could significantly impact cost-effectiveness conclusions in the UK for patients who are not expected to benefit from treatment with platinum-based therapies. Mark Fisher, MSc, Health Economics Manager at WG Consulting and lead author of the study, states, "The final analysis estimated a significant improvement in survival and cost-effectiveness outcomes compared to that originally calculated based on an interim analysis of immature survival data."

Value in Health (ISSN 1098-3015) publishes papers, concepts, and ideas that advance the field of pharmacoeconomics and outcomes research as well as policy papers to help health care leaders make evidence-based decisions. The journal is published bi-monthly and has over 8,000 subscribers (clinicians, decision makers, and researchers worldwide).

International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR) is a nonprofit, international, educational and scientific organization that strives to increase the efficiency, effectiveness, and fairness of health care resource use to improve health.

For more information: www.ispor.org

Related Stories

New ISPOR Report Introduces "IMPACT" Framework to Guide Value-Based Healthcare Implementation

Jul 13, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR—The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research, announced today the publication of an ISPOR Special Task Force Report offering good practice recommendations and a new "IMPACT" framework for integrating health economics and outcomes research (HEOR) methods into value-based healthcare implementation.

Promoting Fairness in Funding Decisions

Jun 24, 2026

Value in Health announced the publication of a special themed section of research papers that offer new tools to help health policy makers weigh fairness alongside cost-effectiveness when deciding which treatments and programs to fund.

Listening to Patients in the Real World

Jun 23, 2026

Value in Health, the official journal of ISPOR announced today the publication of an ISPOR Good Practices Report outlining 9 areas to strengthen the robustness, transparency, and feasibility of real-world patient-reported outcomes studies.
Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×