Abstract

Background

Despite its innovative benefits, the adoption of video consultations (VCs) in primary care settings is complex and slow.

Objectives

To quantify the preferences of key stakeholders in Israel's primary care—patients, primary care practitioners, and policy makers—regarding VCs compared with traditional in-clinic consultations (ICC) in nonurgent conditions.

Methods

Discrete choice experiment surveys were completed by 508 patients, 311 physicians, and 141 policy makers. These consisted of 12 choice tasks of 2 labeled alternatives (VC or ICC), with the 4 attributes most relevant to each stakeholder group. A random effects logit model analysis was used to estimate stakeholders' preferences.

Results

All 4 experiments' attributes were significantly important in choosing VC versus ICC for the patient group and the physician group. Three out of 4 attributes were significantly important to policy makers. Differences and similarities between stakeholders were identified in attribute rank order, trade-offs, and VC uptake probabilities. Policy makers' VC uptake rate was 86%. Patients' preferences suggested that 68% of ICCs could be replaced by VCs. Physicians' VC uptake was 30% in cases in which the consultation purpose was to diagnose and provide treatment and 48% in cases in which the consultation purpose was follow-up.

Conclusions

Our findings show key stakeholders' preferences about VC integration, to be considered when these systems are introduced into primary care and optimize the implementation process. Although there is a stronger preference for ICC among physicians and patients, alternative combinations of attribute levels might be used to compensate and reconfigure a more preferred VC service.