The Development of a National Standardset for Bariatric Surgery Followed By a Digital Solution to Scale It at a National Level in Portugal
Author(s)
Sousa S1, Dossin A1, Silva A2, Campos JC3, Costa EJL4, Vasconcelos PM5, Manso F6, Manaças L7, Etges AP8, Polanczyk CA8, Geubelle A2
1Prologica, SA, São João da Madeira, Aveiro, Portugal, 2Prologica, SA, Torreira, 01, Portugal, 3Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal, 4Centro Hospitalar Universitário de São João, Porto, Porto, Portugal, 5Hospital Distrital de Santarém, Santarém, Santarém, Portugal, 6Hospital de Braga, Braga, Braga, Portugal, 7Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Lisboa Central, Lisboa, Lisboa, Portugal, 8PEV Healthcare Consulting, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
OBJECTIVES: To co-create a practical standardset of measures to be digitalized in an integrated platform to evaluate risk-adjusted outcomes for the bariatric surgery pathway.
METHODS: A group of multidisciplinary healthcare experts (surgeons, physicians, managers, IT) from 5 public hospitals and VBHC consultants led the process. International guidelines for bariatric surgery were reviewed to identify the most relevant outcome measures, and a sequence of meetings was conducted in each center to identify internal pathways and guidelines. A final workshop joined all the teams to achieve a consensus and validate, in a dynamic activity, the final standards to be used by Portuguese providers and payers. The validation considered the clinician's opinion about the importance of each variable and the feasibility of having its collection and analysis automated in a digital platform.
RESULTS: A final standardset was created, consisting of a list of variables to be considered, their definition, data source and time of collection. A common timeline was established, and 9 data collection points were defined. The final dataset comprised 59 variables, including case-mix and clinical reported outcomes (CROS). Case-mix variables included demographic data, clinical history, lifestyle habits, anthropometric assessments, lab results, and surgery strategies. CROs included primary and secondary outcomes along with the process of recovery. The document was followed by a list of technical requirements that the information systems need to attend to allow the data collection. The final dataset will be implemented in the digital platform for all participant centres in 2024 (pilot project).
CONCLUSIONS: This project brings to light the importance of co-creation processes for the development of standardsets of measures for specific clinical conditions, to be considered as a national reference for benchmarking purposes. By consolidating the results in a digital platform that can be easily scaled, this project can be a landscape in managing bariatric surgery pathways worldwide.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
RWD162
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Medical Technologies
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Clinician Reported Outcomes
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas