Fit-for-Purpose and Scalable Strategy to Address Mortality Completeness for Oncology Research: Comparison of Multiple Real-World Sources with the National Death Index
Author(s)
Aguilar K1, Wang Y2, Sykes C2, Reinwald S2, Su Z3, Paulus J2, Robert N2
1Ontada, Seal Beach, CA, USA, 2Ontada, Boston, MA, USA, 3Ontada, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Most healthcare research, including oncology studies, requires accurate vitality/mortality information. This retrospective, observational cohort study examined mortality/vitality completeness across multiple real-world sources among patients with high mortality burden conditions, glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC).
METHODS: Adult patients diagnosed with GBM or mPC between 1/1/19–12/31/19 were followed from diagnosis through 8/31/23. Mortality data were sourced from electronic health records, US Oncology’s Financial Data Warehouse (FDW), the Limited Access Death Master File, commercially-available mortality dataset linked by Datavant tokens, and the National Death Index (NDI). Vitality status was confirmed on 1/15/23 through chart abstraction. Overall survival (OS) with and without NDI data was estimated with Kaplan-Meier methods; censoring patients without a death record on their last contact date.
RESULTS: 173 patients with GBM (median age 65 years, median 12.0 months follow-up) and 990 with mPC (median age 68 years, median 7.1 months follow-up) were included. In total, 157 (90.8%) and 929 (93.8%) of patients with GBM and mPC, respectively, had a death record in at least one source. Of the 77 patients without death records in any source, 46 patients (59.7%) were confirmed alive through abstraction (97.3% overall mortality-vitality capture). Among the 852 patients with death records from multiple sources, 844 (99.1%) had the same month-year across sources. With only structured EHR, FDW, and commercial sources, 993 (91.4%) of all death records (n=1,086) were captured. Among GBM patients, median OS was 13.7 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.4-14.7) and 13.5 months (95% CI 10.8-14.4) with and without NDI data, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality data completeness across all data sources was over 90% in this study, with strong agreement across sources. As 91% of death records were captured without chart abstraction or the NDI, survival estimation without these sources can be a fit-for-purpose and scalable option for oncology research.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
CO188
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Methodological & Statistical Research, Organizational Practices, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Best Research Practices, Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Electronic Medical & Health Records, Missing Data
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Oncology