Examine the Use of Real-World Evidence To Support FDA Decision-Making for New Drug Applications and Biologics License Applications From 2021 to 2022
Author(s)
Cheng CH1, Farley JF2
1University of Minnesota, Saint Paul, MN, USA, 2University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The 21st Century Cures Act has played a pivotal role in accelerating the use of real-world evidence (RWE) into regulatory decision-making. It has led to significant changes in incorporating RWE into drug development regulation. This research aims to identify cases applying RWE in FDA approvals for New Drug Applications (NDAs) and Biologics License Applications (BLAs) and to understand the contribution of RWE in the US regulatory process.
METHODS: To identify cases applying RWE, we reviewed NDA and BLA approvals from 2021 to 2022 in the Drugs@FDA database. Approvals for new molecular entities (NMEs) with NDA type 1 and type 9 were included based on FDA's classification system. We examined RWE keywords through FDA review documents.
RESULTS: Between 2021 and 2022, the FDA approved 255 NDA and BLA submissions. 92% of 88 NME cases incorporated RWE in their submissions to support the therapeutics context. Among these, 16 cases used RWE to support either effectiveness or safety, with oncology (31.3%) being the most common therapeutics area, followed by neurology (12.5%), dermatology (12.5%), and endocrinology/metabolism/bone (12.5%). Notably, 75% of these cases received at least one of the designations-priority review, orphan drug, breakthrough therapy, and fast track, indicating high unmet needs. The application of fosdenopterin utilized RWE as primary evidence for effectiveness, while others used RWE as supportive evidence. However, 3 cases incorporating RWE to support effectiveness did not provide adequate evidence for decision making.
CONCLUSIONS: In recent FDA’s regulatory decisions for NMEs, RWE have been incorporated into their submissions for diseases with high unmet needs. To support effectiveness, RWE has been applied as an external control arm to compare with single-arm trials or as a description of the disease’s natural history. However, it is crucial to address biases during the analysis to minimize potential harmful effects.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
HPR127
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment, Organizational Practices, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Approval & Labeling, Decision & Deliberative Processes, Industry, Literature Review & Synthesis
Disease
Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal), Neurological Disorders, Oncology, Rare & Orphan Diseases