Public Preferences for Improving Health Equity: A Qualitative Focus Group Study

Author(s)

Cadham C1, Ali S2, Meza R3, Prosser L1
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2Western University, London, ON, Canada, 3BC Cancer Research Institute, Vancouver, BC, Canada

OBJECTIVES: Novel approaches to economic evaluation seek to value improvements in health equity. These approaches use population preferences, often elicited from choice experiments, to weight health outcomes across equity domains or attributes. Few studies have sought to understand which attributes the general public prioritizes. We sought to understand the attitudes and beliefs of residents of Canada and the United States on valuing health equity. Results will aid in the design of future choice experiments to value health equity.

METHODS: We conducted online focus groups with residents of both countries. Participants were recruited online using a purposive sampling technique. Conversations focused on conceptions of fairness in health care and identifying equity-relevant attributes that respondents consider relevant to fair resource allocation decisions. Transcripts and notes were assessed in an iterative manner using a constant comparative technique.

RESULTS: 29 individuals in Canada and 27 in the US participated in the focus groups. Participants in both countries had similar views that a fair system is based on equality in access, where all individuals can access quality care and be treated equally regardless of their characteristics and circumstances. In the US, themes across focus groups were promoting universal access, affordability, and individual responsibility in health. In Canada, common themes included promoting universality, accessibility, particularly in rural areas, and reduced wait times. Improved access was often considered more important than efforts to achieve similar health outcomes. Discussions highlighted the importance of framing questions of health equity. When asked about allocating resources, respondents were unwilling to use characteristics such as race, ethnicity, or gender in determining equitable allocations. Yet, these characteristics were often cited as important to consider when identifying disparities to address.

CONCLUSIONS: Future choice experiments to value improvements to health equity must carefully consider how respondents conceptualize equity regarding the allocation of health care resources.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

EE327

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Health Disparities & Equity, Novel & Social Elements of Value

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×