Uptake of Early Health Technology Assessment in the United States (US): A Literature Review of Empirical Studies

Author(s)

Koufopoulou M1, Stewart F2, Gomez-Espinosa E3
1Xcenda UK Limited, a part of Cencora, London, UK, 2Xcenda GmbH, a part of Cencora, Hannover, Germany, 3Xcenda UK Limited, part of Cencora, London, UK

OBJECTIVES: Traditional health technology assessments (HTAs) assess the cost-effectiveness of a product at the end of the development process, whereas early HTA informs decision-making at early stages of development. The advantage of early HTA is that go-no-go decisions are facilitated prior to investment of considerable resources. The objective of this research was to provide an overview of early HTAs conducted in the US.

METHODS: A comprehensive literature review was conducted to identify empirical studies that reported on the implementation of early HTA in the US. Searches were run in Embase and Medline in December 2023 to identify English-language literature published since 2017. Other sources included hand-searching reference lists of relevant literature reviews.

RESULTS: The literature searches identified 454 records, of which 98 were selected for full-text screening. Seven publications, reporting findings of early HTAs for 7 technologies, met the criteria for inclusion. Technologies assessed included 4 medical devices, 2 drugs, and 1 gene therapy. Markov state transition models were the most common modeling approach (n=4), followed by simulation models (n=2) and decision-analytic models (n=1). Although all early HTAs conducted extensive sensitivity and scenario analyses to identify influential parameters, only 1 conducted value-of-information analysis. All early HTAs reported economic evaluation results in favor of the technology under investigation; 4 early HTAs found the technologies to be potentially cost-effective at relatively high willingness-to-pay thresholds (>$100,000), while 3 early HTAs concluded that the uptake of those new technologies may lead to cost-savings. The lack of robust clinical evidence and uncertainties related to the cost of the technologies were noted as limitations.

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings are in agreement with the conclusions of other reviews published on the topic. Early economic modeling is the preferred tool for informing manufacturers in the initial stages of the development process; however, guidance on how to conduct early HTA is lacking.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-05, ISPOR 2024, Atlanta, GA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)

Code

HTA57

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×