Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of First-Line Pembrolizumab Monotherapy for Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Author(s)
Kamboj G1, Radotra A2, Barman P1, Dongare S3, Aggarwal S1, Rathi H4
1Skyward Analytics Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram, Haryana, India, 2Skyward Analytics Pvt. Ltd., Gurugram, HR, India, 3Skyward Analytics Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, India, 4Skyward Analytics Pvt. Ltd., Gurgaon, HR, India
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This study involves meta-analysis aiming to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab monotherapy as first-line treatment for programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
METHODS: Data was collected from eligible studies identified through a systematic search of PubMed, Europe PMC, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar, conference proceedings from ASCO, ESMO, and WCLC congress (2021-2023), and references of relevant systematic reviews up to November 2023. The observational studies evaluating the overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), or safety were included. However, the studies assessing only geriatric patients or patients with extremely high PD-L1 tumor proportion scores were excluded. The National Institutes of Health (NIH) quality assessment tool for observational studies was used to assess the quality of included studies. A single-arm meta-analysis was performed in R software using a standard random-effects model. Cochran’s Q-test and I2 statistics were estimated to assess heterogeneity across studies.
RESULTS: Twenty-five studies with 7,293 patients were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled OS rates at 6, 12, and 36 months were 69%, 45%, and 38%, respectively. The corresponding pooled PFS rates were 60%, 33%, and 20%. The pooled ORR was 46%. The evidence revealed all-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), immune-related adverse events (IRAEs), and pneumonitis to be 37%, 54%, and 22%, respectively. The respective incidence rates of grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were 12%, 7%, and 5%. Fifteen percent of patients discontinued pembrolizumab due to AEs. The funnel plots revealed no to minimal levels of publication bias visually.
CONCLUSIONS: Real-world evidence for the effectiveness and safety of pembrolizumab is consistent with the findings of KEYNOTE-024 and KEYNOTE-042 trials. The congruence of results lends support to the use of pembrolizumab monotherapy as a first-line treatment for improving outcomes in advanced or metastatic NSCLC.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 6, S1 (June 2024)
Code
SA11
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Electronic Medical & Health Records, Literature Review & Synthesis, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Oncology