Which Telehealth Features Matter Most? Ranking Results from HIV Care Providers and Patients Living with HIV in South Carolina

Author(s)

Gass SJ1, Yelverton V2, Weissman S1, Amoatika D1, Cooke C1, Ostermann J1, Albrecht H1
1University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA, 2University of South Carolina, Woodbury, MN, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: During the COVID-19 pandemic, telehealth was rapidly implemented to mitigate disruptions in HIV care services. However, participation in and benefits from telehealth were not distributed equally among people living with HIV (PWH). The acceptability of alternative telehealth options in HIV care remains understudied. This study aims to assess the relative importance of telehealth features among HIV care providers and PWH.

METHODS: We compiled a comprehensive list of 21 telehealth features from the literature and formative research. Telehealth features were grouped into four domains with 4-6 features each: administrative (5), technology (6), visit-related (6), and other (4) features. 22 purposively selected participants (10 HIV care providers, 12 PWH) from South Carolina were asked to rank these features within domains and the domains themselves according to their perceived relative importance. Ranking data was analyzed through count analysis.

RESULTS: Domain rankings indicated that visit-related features such as a prior relationship with the provider and multidisciplinary virtual visits were most important. Administrative features such as scheduling modalities (e.g., virtual walk-in options) and the waiting time for an appointment were second most important, followed by technological features such as the type of provider (artificial intelligence vs. human provider) and type of telehealth (video, voice-only, or email). Other features such as the availability of technical support and the location where telehealth visits take place were least important to our participants. Across telehealth features, the relationship to the provider was most often ranked first (14 out of 22 participants) followed by out-of-pocket cost (9 out of 22 participants).

CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight the importance of visit-related and administrative features of telehealth. A pre-existing relationship with the telehealth provider was particularly important to many providers and patient participants. Findings may inform telehealth HIV care options to meet the needs of PWH and HIV care providers.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

HSD98

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×