Comparison of Primary Care Quality Among Rural, Urban, and Online Providers: Evidence from a Pooled Analysis of Standardized Patient Studies in China
Author(s)
Huang M1, Rozelle S2, Cao Y2, Zhang Z3, Tang W4, Duan Z3, Sylvia SY3
1Wuhan University, Wuhan, 42, China, 2Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA, 3University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 4Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital, Guangzhou, China
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This paper aims to provide a comparison of five types of primary care providers in China: rural clinics, county hospitals, migrant clinics, urban community health centers (CHCs), and online platforms.
METHODS: We pooled the data from four programs that used standardized patients (SPs) to evaluate and compare the quality of primary care from various health care providers in China. We considered five different types of providers: a.) rural clinics; b.) county hospitals; c.) migrant clinics; d.) urban CHCs; and e.) online platforms. We evaluated the quality of care on three main domains: a.) process quality; b.) diagnosis quality; and c.) case management. We use multiple regressions to assess the differences in quality outcomes by provider type, and to examine the associations between quality outcomes and physician characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, the quality of primary care in China is very poor across all provider types. Urban CHCs and online platforms generally provided higher-quality primary care than other providers. In particular, CHCs showed distinct advantages, including the highest process quality, diagnosis quality, and correct medications of the five provider types. Among the three poorer-quality provider types, the quality of care was higher in county hospitals than in rural clinics, and poorest in migrant clinics. Finally, we observe a positive association between physician qualifications and quality of primary care provided.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings reveal substantial quality gaps among care providers in China. Rural residents are most vulnerable to the poor quality of primary health care. While online platforms can play an important role in expanding access to higher-quality medical resources in underserved areas, they also have drawbacks and cannot serve as effective replacements for offline options. Improving primary health care quality in these areas requires financial incentives to attract high-quality practitioners and regulations, so as to prevent unnecessary care and prescriptions.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
HSD115
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas