How Are We Treating Our Patients? An Experts’ Panel Perspective from Brazilian Healthcare System on Treatment Access for Chronic Phase Chronic Myeloid Leukemia (CP-CML)

Author(s)

Boquimpani C1, Pagnano K2, Centrone R3, de Oliveira D4, Kashiura D5, Hamerschlak N6
1HEMORIO, State Institute of Hematology Arthur de Siquiera Cavalcanti, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 2Universidade Estadual de Campinas, Campinas, Brazil, 33. Instituto Hemomed de Oncologia e Hematologia, São Paulo, Brazil, 4Novartis Biocências SA, São Paulo, SP, Brazil, 5Novartis Brazil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil, 65. Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To analyze therapies available for CP-CML patients in Brazilian public and private healthcare systems, as well as assess current clinical practices and unmet needs of patients in third-line treatment.

METHODS: Expert panels were implemented to seek consensus from 14 experienced hematologists from major centers across Brazil, as well as capture data on their opinion and current practices. Data was transcribed and descriptive statistics was performed using Microsoft Excel 365.

RESULTS: 2,157 CP-CML patients (82% from the public healthcare system). 1,510 (70%) patients were receiving first-line treatment, predominantly imatinib (90%); patients who failed remained in this strategy for an average of 18 months. Resistance (44%) and intolerance (25%) were the main causes to progress to a 2nd line. 421 patients (20%) were receiving second-line treatment, mainly nilotinib (50%) and dasatinib (32.5%); patients who failed remained under this strategy for an average of 18 months. The remaining 17.5% were either in other therapies or underwent hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (HSCT). Resistance (47.5%) and intolerance (23.7%) were also the main causes to progress to 3rd line; other causes included disease progression and lack of treatment adherence. 216 (10%) were in third-line treatment: nilotinib (50%) and dasatinib (20%); patients who failed remained, on average, for 12 months. HSCT was indicated for only 10% of 3rd line patients. Ponatinib was available for only 20 patients in private healthcare; bosutinib was not available; asciminib was restricted to patients in the Phase-3 research protocol.

CONCLUSIONS: Patients requiring third-line treatment correspond to ~10% of CP-CML patients in Brazil. They are treated with 2nd generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) due to lack of access to 3rd generation TKIs, especially in public healthcare. Studies show that choosing a 2nd generation TKI after the failure of another yields poor response rates. Access to new TKIs is, therefore, fundamental to adequately address this population’s unmet needs.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

HSD80

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinician Reported Outcomes, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×