An Analysis of US Urologists Performing Outpatient-Based Inflatable Penile Prosthesis Implantation
Author(s)
Durand K1, Rojanasarot S2
1Boston Scientific, Cold Spring Harbor, MA, USA, 2Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES:
Inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) implantation is a definitive treatment for men with erectile dysfunction (ED). Few urologists receive IPP procedure instruction and experience during a fellowship or residency, potentially limiting patient access to IPP care. This study explored the US administrative claims data of IPP implanters to better understand IPP practices. METHODS: This study used administrative claims data from Definitive Healthcare to identify implanters who performed IPP (CPT®54405) in hospital outpatient settings on a sample of patients with commercial insurance or Medicare in 2021. The number of IPP procedures performed by each implanter was calculated by summing the implant claim volume performed on commercially-insured and Medicare patients. Less than 11 Medicare procedures performed by any individual implanter were defaulted with a procedure volume of 10. A geographical analysis was conducted using each implanter’s primary affiliated hospital to identify the US state in which each implanter performed their IPP procedures. RESULTS: In 2021, 21,835 outpatient-based IPP procedures were performed by 2,049 urologists, equivalent to approximately 10.7 procedures per implanter per year. The IPP volumes were left skewed as 91.4% of urologists performed less than 20 IPP cases, representing 66.3% the procedure volumes. The top implanters who performed more than 100 IPP cases accounted for 6.3% of the procedure volumes. A geographical analysis found Florida (11.2%), California (7.8%), Texas (7.5%), New York (5.9%), Michigan (4.2%), Ohio, and Georgia had the highest numbers of IPP implanters. The findings are consistent with the top seven states with the highest IPP volume (Florida [11.4%], Texas [9.4%], New York [6.5%], California [6.3%], Ohio [5.8%], Georgia [4.2%], and Michigan [3.4%]). CONCLUSIONS: A majority of IPP implanters performed less than 20 outpatient-based IPP procedures in a given year. Since the ED prevalence among US men is on the rise, future research could explore ways to improve IPP implant training and provision.Conference/Value in Health Info
2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)
Code
MT37
Topic
Medical Technologies
Topic Subcategory
Medical Devices
Disease
Medical Devices, Urinary/Kidney Disorders