Implementation of Guideline-Recommended Strategies for Stroke Prevention in U.S. Adults with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis

Author(s)

Ye W1, Jiang X2, Kuo S3, Herman WH3, Li J1, Morgenstern L1, Lisabeth LD1
1University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA, 2University of California, San Francisco, MI, USA, 3University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Substantial opportunity exists to enhance primary prevention of stroke in type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of improved implementation of seven current guideline-recommended strategies for primary stroke prevention in U.S. adults with T2D.

METHODS: Based on National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) data from 2015-2018, we identified individuals with T2D aged ≥45 years without stroke history. We simulated stroke events, stroke-related quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and healthcare costs for this population over a 10-year horizon using a microsimulation model, the Michigan Model for Diabetes, comparing seven scenarios each with full implementation of one of the seven primary prevention strategies versus a status-quo scenario. The status-quo scenario assumed that the level of implementation of each of the seven prevention strategies was the average national implementation level in 2015-2018. The enhanced scenarios assumed all individuals implemented particular strategy as soon as they became eligible. Analyses were performed from a health system/payer perspective.

RESULTS: Full implementation of the well-controlled blood pressure (BP) strategy would result in approximately 237,200 fewer stroke events, 95,000 fewer stroke-related deaths, a gain of 0.05 QALYs, and savings of $24.6 billion (2014 US dollar) nationally. In contrast, fully-enhanced implementation of the well-control HbA1c level strategy cost $279 billion more nationally at a slight loss of 0.005 QALYs. Full implementation of guidelines related to statins, aspirin, warfarin treatment for atrial fibrillation, or smoking cessation would be cost-effective or cost-saving. The strategy of losing 5% weight for all overweight or obese individuals would not be cost-effective.

CONCLUSIONS: Enhancing implementation of guideline-recommended strategies for BP control, and statins, aspirin, warfarin treatment, and smoking cessation for the U.S. adult T2D population without stroke history could potentially avert a large number of stroke events, improve quality-of-life stroke-related deaths, and be cost-saving.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

EE1

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Decision Modeling & Simulation

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×