Scoping Review and Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness and Safety of Powered Stapler and Manual Stapler

Author(s)

Xu Q1, Liu B2
1School of Public Health, Fudan University, shanghai, China, 2School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES:

To evaluate effectiveness and safety of the powered staplers versus manual staplers performing in surgery.

METHODS:

A systematic literature search (CNKI, Wang Fan, Medline, EMBASE and Web of science) was performed to identify clinical studies comparing powered staplers and manual staplers. The primary outcomes including operation time, length of hospital stay, blood loss, anastomotic leakage/air leakage incidence, bleeding/blood transfusion rate, 30-day readmission rate, physician satisfaction and instrument performance index. Meta-analysis was conducted to calculate odds ratio (OR) and mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals. Further subgroup analysis was conducted to compare powered with manual in linear/vascular staplers and powered with manual in circular staplers.

RESULTS:

A total of 19 studies were included in final analysis, with 6 single-arm studies on powered staplers and 13 studies comparing the use of powered and manual staplers in surgery. Thirteen of the included studies were retrospective studies and 6 were prospective studies. Statistically significant differences were observed in terms of operation time [MD=-13.65, 95CI% (-17.23, -10.06)], length of hospital stay [MD=-1.37, 95CI% (-2.03, -0.71)], anastomotic leakage/air leakage incidence [OR=0.43, 95CI% (0.26, 0.70)], and 30-day readmission rate [OR=0.80, 95%CI (0.71, 0.89)] in favor of powered staplers. No statistically significant differences were observed for blood loss, bleeding/blood transfusion rate. Subgroup analysis showed compared with manual linear/vascular staplers, powered linear/vascular staplers significantly reduced the operation time and 30-day readmission rate, while showed no significant superiority in anastomotic leakage/air leakage incidence and bleeding/blood transfusion rate. Compared with manual circular staplers, powered circular staplers significantly reduced the incidence of anastomotic leakage. Also, existing studies showed powered stapler was more user-friendly, better instrument performance.

CONCLUSIONS:

Our study showed superiority of powered staplers compared to manual staplers in operation time, length of hospital stay, anastomotic leakage/air leakage incidence and 30-day readmission rate. However, further high-quality studies are needed to obtain definitive conclusions.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-05, ISPOR 2023, Boston, MA, USA

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 6, S2 (June 2023)

Code

CO44

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders (including obesity), Gastrointestinal Disorders, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×