Validation of a Health-Related Quality of Life Questionnaire in Patients with Recurrent Clostridioides Difficile Infection in Ecospor-III, a Phase 3 Randomized Trial
Author(s)
Lapin B1, Garey K2, Wu H3, Pham S4, Huang S4, Reese PR5, Wang E6, McGovern B6, Deshpande A7
1Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland Heights, OH, USA, 2University of Houston, Houston, TX, USA, 3CR Medicon Research, Inc., Piscataway, NJ, USA, 4AESARA, Chapel Hill, NC, USA, 5Reese Associates Consulting, LLC, Cary, NC, USA, 6Seres Therapeutics, Cambridge, MA, USA, 7Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Symptoms associated with recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection (rCDI) are debilitating, often leading to long-term effects on health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL). In ECOSPOR-III, a Phase 3 trial, oral SER-109 was superior to placebo in reducing risk of rCDI. This study sought to establish the validity and responsiveness of a CDI-specific questionnaire (Cdiff32) in patients with rCDI regardless of treatment arm.
METHODS: Adult outpatients with rCDI (≥3 episodes in 12 months) were screened at 56 US/Canadian sites. After completing standard-of-care antibiotics, subjects were randomized 1:1 to SER-109 or placebo. The primary endpoint was rCDI (toxin+ diarrhea requiring treatment) at 8 weeks. Exploratory endpoints included the EQ-5D-5L and Cdiff32, a 32-item questionnaire measuring HRQOL overall and across mental, physical, and social subscales, at baseline, 1 and 8 weeks. The Cdiff32 was evaluated for dimensionality, item performance, internal reliability, and convergent validity. To assess known-groups validity, Cdiff32 scores were compared across recurrent versus non-recurrent patients at week 1. Internal responsiveness was evaluated in non-recurrent patients by 8 weeks using a paired t-test.
RESULTS: Cdiff32 was completed at baseline by 182 patients (mean age 65.5±16.5, 59.9% female). Confirmatory factor analysis identified 3 domains with good item fit. High internal reliability was demonstrated (Cronbach’s alpha=0.94 with all subscales>0.80). Convergent validity was evidenced by significant correlations between Cdiff32 subscales and EQ-5D index (r range: 0.27-0.36, p<0.001). Cdiff32 differentiated recurrent (n=44) from non-recurrent (n=130) patients at week 1 (effect sizes: 0.38-0.43; p<0.05 for all), and was responsive to change, with significant improvement from baseline to week 8 in 134 non-recurrent patients (effect sizes: 0.75-1.02; p<0.001 for all).
CONCLUSIONS: Cdiff32 demonstrated excellent validity and reliability in patients with rCDI, with significant improvement in patients without recurrence by 8 weeks. These findings highlight the negative impact of rCDI on HRQOL and justify the utilization of the Cdiff32 in patients with rCDI.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
PCR150
Topic
Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Gastrointestinal Disorders