Practice of Use of Food Supplements in Cancer Patients

Author(s)

Töltösi E1, Boncz I2, Endrei D2, Kívés Z3
1Baxter Hungary Kft., Budapest, Hungary, 2University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary, 3University of Pécs, PÉCS, BA, Hungary

Objectives: The use of complementary therapies is significant among cancer patients. The aim of the research was to find out what additional therapies are used by patients diagnosed with cancer. Besides, what kind of factors influence their choice between medicines and how much financial burden this means for them.

Methods: Quantitative cross-sectional research was performed among non-randomized patients (n=111) in Hungary. We applied a questionnaire survey, groups of questions: sociodemographic data, disease characteristics, dietary supplements used, information shared with physicians, source of information, costs, impact assessment. In addition to the descriptive statistical analysis χ2-test, Independent samples t-test, ANOVA were applied (p<0.05) with SPSS software.

Results: The mean age was 49.8 years. 33.4% use high doses of vitamins C and D, herbs that are considered effective. 48.6% inform the treating physician about the preparations used. Economically active people are significantly (p=0.006) less likely to use any additional treatment or consult a naturopath than inactive people. This may be related to the price of the preparations. Avemar is used by 68.5%, Aloe vera 56.8% and 52% use variations of cannabidiol (CBD). Among the reasons for use, the answer “I wanted to try everything that could help” was most often indicated by 74.2% (69 people). 25.2% spend 15.56 USD on different treatments and 27.9% spend more than 77.6 USD on alternative therapies. Those who spend between 15-30 USD per month are significantly (p=0.019) less satisfied (53.1%) with the outcome of treatment (satisfied with 20%). The most important sources of information are the physician (88.3%) and the Internet (55.9%).

Conclusions: Interviewed mostly started alternative therapies because they wanted to try everything that could help. Traditional treatments are thought to be too “mechanical” or frustrated with traditional treatments. Most of them spend more than 77 USD on alternative treatments in a month.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)

Code

PCR18

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Patient Behavior and Incentives, Patient Engagement

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×