Sintilimab Plus Chemotherapy for First-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Nonsquamous Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (AMNSQNSCLC): A Systematic Literature Review (SLR) and Network Meta-Analysis (NMA)
Author(s)
Garassino M1, Brnabic A2, Stefaniak V3, Belger M4, Gruver K3, Chen JV5, Souri S5, Molife C3, Blumenschein G6
1University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA, 2Eli Lilly and Company, Croydon, NSW, Australia, 3Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, IN, USA, 4Eli Lilly and Company, Bracknell, UK, 5Medical Decision Modeling Inc., Indianapolis, IN, USA, 6MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
Presentation Documents
Background: In ORIENT-11, addition of sintilimab to first-line chemotherapy demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) in Chinese patients with AMnsqNSCLC. This SLR and NMA compared the efficacy and safety of sintilimab+pemetrexed+platinum versus FDA-approved and NCCN-recommended immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations (ICIs) for first-line treatment of AMnsqNSCLC. Methods: SLR followed the PRISMA guideline. Eligible studies were phase 2 and 3 RCTs published in English between 1991 and September 2021 comparing efficacy or safety of ICIs with other treatments for AMnsqNSCLC without EGFR/ALK mutations. Bayesian fixed and random effects NMA with independent baseline models were used, and chemotherapy was the common comparator. PFS, OS, ORR, and exposure-adjusted adverse events(AEs) were the key outcomes analyzed. Hazard ratios(HR)<1.0, odds ratios(OR)>1.0, and median exposure-adjusted rate difference(D)>0 favored the reference treatment, sintilimab+pemetrexed+platinum. Results: After screening 6,418 records, 11 RCTs involving a total of 4,979 eligible patients regardless of PD-L1 status were included in the primary evidence network. ICIs with chemotherapy were generally superior to chemotherapy alone. For PFS, pembrolizumab+pemetrexed+platinum(HR 0.96 [95% Credible Interval: 0.71-1.30]) and atezolizumab+bevacizumab+platinum+nab-paclitaxel(0.83 [0.57-1.19]) were not significantly different to sintilimab+pemetrexed+platinum. Sintilimab+pemetrexed+platinum had significantly better PFS compared to atezolizumab+platinum+nab-paclitaxel(0.57[0.40-0.82]) and nivolumab+ipilimumab+pemetrexed+platinum(0.66[0.48-0.92]). Sintilimab+pemetrexed+platinum was not significantly different for OS: atezolizumab+bevacizumab+platinum+nab-paclitaxel(0.85[0.59-1.23]), atezolizumab+platinum+nab-paclitaxel(0.81[0.56-1.17]), pembrolizumab+pemetrexed+platinum(1.08[0.79-1.47]), nivolumab+ipilimumab+pemetrexed+platinum(0.95[0.67-1.34]), and nivolumab+ipilimumab(0.83[0.61-1.13]). Rate of Grade≥3 AEs(D range:-0.35-0.84) and ORR(OR range:0.73-1.91) were comparable across ICIs. Conclusions: This NMA showed that sintilimab+pemetrexed+platinum was associated with comparable efficacy and safety versus standard-of-care ICIs in the US, further supporting the favorable benefit/risk profile of ICI versus chemotherapy among patients with previously untreated AMnsqNSCLC and no EGFR or ALK mutations. The results may aid clinical decision-making and future cost-effectiveness evaluation of ICIs in the absence of head-to-head evidence from RCTs.
Conference/Value in Health Info
2022-05, ISPOR 2022, Washington, DC, USA
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 6, S1 (June 2022)
Code
CO19
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Meta-Analysis & Indirect Comparisons
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas