DOES INCLUDING ACUTE PANCREATITIS AS A COMPLICATION HAVE AN IMPACT ON COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSES USING THE IQVIA CORE DIABETES MODEL?

Author(s)

Monteiro S1, Ramos M2, Lamotte M3
1IQVIA, London, LON, UK, 2IQVIA, Zaventem, VOV, Belgium, 3IQVIA, Zaventem, VBR, Belgium

OBJECTIVES

Acute pancreatitis has significant morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have raised the possibility that therapies such as dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) may increase the risk of acute pancreatitis. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of adding acute pancreatitis as a complication on incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), using the IQVIA Core Diabetes Model v9.5.

METHODS

Baseline characteristics and treatment effects from the observational EDGE study comparing metformin+vildagliptin (M+V) with metformin+sulphonylurea (M+S) were employed: mean age 57.8 years, diabetes duration 6 years, 54.8% male, HbA1c 8.2% and BMI 29kg/m2; HbA1c reductions were -0.99% and -1.19%, with changes of -0.3kg and -1.6kg in body weight for M+S and M+V, respectively. Acute pancreatitis (AP) occured in 0.65% and 0.44% of patients in the M+V and M+S arms, respectively. Case fatality was 8.7%. Direct costs and disutility score of an AP event were GBP 23,865 and -0.25, respectively. Cardiovascular disease and mortality risks were determined using the UKPDS82 outcomes model. The time horizon was 10 years.

RESULTS

Not including pancreatitis as a complication resulted in total costs of GBP 13,592/11,314 and total quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of 5.042/4.991 for M+V/M+S arms, respectively. The resulting ICER was 45,572 GBP/QALY. Including pancreatitis as a complication resulted in total costs of GBP 14,599/12,028 and total QALYs of 5.027/4.983 for M+V/M+S arms. The resulting ICER was 58,298 GBP/QALY. Cumulative incidence of AP over a 10-year time horizon was 5.69% for M+V and 3.89% for M+S. The mean AP treatment cost per patient for M+V/M+S was GBP 1,069/723.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding acute pancreatitis as a complication to a diabetes model can have a considerable impact on the outcomes of cost-effectiveness analyses due to the associated mortality and high cost of the complication.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2020-05, ISPOR 2020, Orlando, FL, USA

Value in Health, Volume 23, Issue 5, S1 (May 2020)

Code

PDB44

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Diabetes/Endocrine/Metabolic Disorders, Gastrointestinal Disorders

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×