Psychometric Properties of Patient Reported Outcome Instruments in Patients With Chronic Inducible Cold Urticaria
Author(s)
Rhoten S1, Ivanescu C2, Guillemin I3, Oliván R4, Msihid J5, Martincova R6, Jingdong C7, Zikos E5, Braham-Chaouche L5, Krol M2, Chuang CC8, Brookes E9
1IQVIA, Patient Centered Solutions, San Francisco, CA, USA, 2IQVIA, Patient Centered Solutions, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3IQVIA, Patient Centered Solutions, Lyon, France, 4IQVIA, Patient Centered Solutions, Barcelona, Spain, 5Sanofi, Gentilly, France, 6Sanofi, Prague, Czech Republic, 7Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Tarrytown, NY, USA, 8Sanofi, Health Economics and Value Assessment, Cambridge, MA, USA, 9Sanofi, Reading , UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: A phase 3 clinical trial (NCT04681729) was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dupilumab among Chronic Inducible Cold Urticaria (ColdU) patients, using several single-item patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) after ice cube application to inform efficacy endpoints: Peak Pruritus-Numeric Rating Scale (PP-NRS), Peak Pain-NRS, and Peak Burning Sensation-NRS (PBS-NRS). Each item is rated on a scale from 0 (no symptom) to 10 (worst symptom severity). Psychometric properties of the three NRSs were assessed using data from the trial.
METHODS: A total of 82 ColdU patients were randomized. The psychometric analyses included construct validity, reliability, and responsiveness; within-patient and between-group meaningful change thresholds (MCTs) were estimated using Patient Global Impression of Change/Severity (PGIC/S) as anchors.
RESULTS: The baseline mean score for PP-NRS, Peak Pain-NRS and PBS-NRS were 6.47, 5.62 and 5.85, respectively. The three NRSs scales demonstrated a near to adequate test-retest reliability (interclass correlation coefficient ranges from 0.56 to 0.68) and an adequate convergent validity (moderate to strong correlation for both PP-NRS and PBS-NRS with several measures, including PGIS, and low to strong correlation for Peak Pain-NRS with the same measures). All scales demonstrated known-groups validity and were sensitive to detect change (all p<0.05). MCTs were estimated for within-patient (PP-NRS: 4, range: 3-6; Peak Pain-NRS: 3, range: 2-3 and PBS-NRS: 3, range: 2-5) and between-group (PP-NRS: 2.7, range: 2.5-3.3; Peak Pain-NRS: 2.2, range: 1.6-3.2 and PBS-NRS: 2.7, range: 1.6-3.4), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The findings demonstrate acceptable psychometric properties of the three NRSs under investigation and support their ability to capture meaningful change in symptoms experienced by the ColdU patients in a clinical trial context.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
PCR212
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes
Disease
Biologics & Biosimilars, Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)