Counting on Data Validity in Multinational Clinical Trials? Numeral Systems in Patient-Reported Outcome Assessments: Guidance for Linguistic Validation

Author(s)

Poepsel T1, Browning R2, Israel R1, Delgaram-Nejad O3, Ramsey P4, Nolde A5, Hadjidemetriou C4, McCullough E6, McKown S1
1RWS Life Sciences, East Hartford, CT, USA, 2RWS Life Sciences, Bloxham, OXF, UK, 3RWS Life Sciences, Dawlish, DEV, UK, 4RWS Life Sciences, Croydon, LON, UK, 5RWS Life Sciences, Chicago, IL, USA, 6RWS Life Sciences, Boston, MA, USA

OBJECTIVES: Western Arabic numerals (i.e., 1, 2, 3) are the most frequently used number symbols, and almost exclusively appear in items or response options in patient-reported outcome assessments (PROs). Linguistic validation (LV) is the process of translating and culturally adapting PROs resulting in comprehensible, patient-friendly translations adapted for use in specific countries, cultures, or populations. Despite wide use and recognition of Western Arabic numerals, some languages have and preferentially use their own numeral systems. This research addresses a paucity of literature regarding such languages and the availability of detailed, PRO-centric information on their numeral systems, aiming to improve LV of numeric text.

METHODS: We surveyed 124 linguists representing 66 languages. Questions asked about the existence of unique numeral systems, contexts for use of Western Arabic and unique systems, preference for system use in daily life, and preference in writing vs typing.

RESULTS: 15/66 (22%) of languages in our sample reported some use of systems other than Western Arabic numerals. For languages using two systems, 8/15 (53%) noted important contextual factors dictating use, such as legal documents (e.g., Traditional Chinese), government documents (Thai), urban vs rural target demographics (Hindi), stylistic or specialized fields (Slovak; Catalan), or formality of intended language (Chinese – Simplified, Traditional). For both writing and typing in everyday use, 33% of linguists in multi-numeral system languages reported no system preference, while 20% preferred the unique system. All 66 languages reported familiarity with and use of Western Arabic numerals in daily contexts.

CONCLUSIONS: Results show Western Arabic numerals as the dominant numeral system, but reveal a non-trivial subset of languages with unique and contextually relevant numeral systems whose use should be considered in LV. For any PROs, and especially common types such as numeric rating scales, appropriate numeric localization to maximize patient comprehension is essential for collecting valid data.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

PCR191

Topic

Patient-Centered Research

Topic Subcategory

Instrument Development, Validation, & Translation, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×