The Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel Versus Standard of Care As Second-Line Therapy in Patients With Large B-Cell Lymphoma in Germany
Author(s)
Kron F1, Reimeir L2, Welte R2, Rodriguez-Guadarrama Y3, van Hees F4, Smith N4, Blissett R4, Vadgama S5, Doble B6
1FOM University of Applied Sciences, Essen, Germany, 2Gilead Sciences GmbH, Gaimersheim, BY, Germany, 3Maple Health Group, LLC, Coyoacan, MEX, Mexico, 4Maple Health Group, LLC, New York City, NY, USA, 5Kite, a Gilead Company, Uxbridge, England, UK, 6Kite, a Gilead Company, Bridge of Allan, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) demonstrated superior overall survival versus standard of care (SOC; salvage chemoimmunotherapy followed by high-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell transplantation for responders) in the treatment of relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (2L LBCL) in adults in the ZUMA-7 trial (NCT03391466). This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of axi-cel versus SOC in 2L LBCL from the German statutory health insurance perspective.
METHODS: Using a partitioned survival model, we estimated costs, life-years (LYs), and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) over a lifetime time horizon. The model was populated with efficacy, safety, and utility inputs based on patient level data from ZUMA-7. Time-to-event data were extrapolated beyond the trial period using mixture cure models validated by clinical experts. Medical resource use data and 2023-year unit costs in German Euros (€) were obtained from the literature and German price databases. Outcomes and costs were discounted at 3% per annum. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the results.
RESULTS: 2L axi-cel treatment resulted in LY and QALY gains of 1.74 and 1.64, respectively, and incremental costs of €85,255 compared to SOC, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of €51,830 per QALY. Results were driven by improved survival and quality of life associated with axi-cel, despite substantial utilization of chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy in third line in the SOC arm. Model results were robust in sensitivity analyses. Key drivers included the standardized mortality ratio applied to the general population mortality for long-term axi-cel survivors and the mean age of the patients considered in the model.
CONCLUSIONS: Axi-cel treatment results in meaningful increases in LYs and QALYs compared to SOC in adult patients with 2L LBCL. Based on its ICER and commonly cited willingness-to-pay thresholds in Germany, axi-cel can be considered a cost-effective treatment for Germany.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)
Code
EE403
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies, Oncology