The Willingness to Pay Threshold in the Netherlands: Time for an Update!

Author(s)

Borghouts- de Ruijter A1, Terwindt E2, Severens JL3, Fassler P2
1Gilead Sciences Netherlands, Amsterdam, North Holland, Netherlands, 2Gilead Sciences, Amsterdam, Netherlands, 3Severens HTA Consultancy, Venray, Limburg, Netherlands

OBJECTIVES: Pharmaceutical technologies are placed in the basic insurance package in the Netherlands based on four criteria: Necessary care, Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Feasibility. While only effectiveness is anchored in law by assessing established medical science and medical practice, cost-effectiveness has become increasingly more important in decision making. Cost-effectiveness estimates of technologies are weighed against the Willingness To Pay (WTP) thresholds. The objective of this research is to investigate the establishment and evolution of the WTP-thresholds in the Netherlands.

METHODS: A literature search was done on publications of the Dutch HTA bodies and scientific publications on the setting of the WTP-thresholds, and the relation with disease burden.

RESULTS: In 2006, The ‘Council of public health and society’ suggested a linear model to define the WTP-threshold related to burden of disease up to 80.000 EUR/QALY. The maximum value was based on several references published between 1999-2006 (e.g. costs of one year nursing home; systematic review of the value of statistical life in the US). In 2010 the Health Care Institute (ZIN) set two additional thresholds, stepwise increasing with burden of disease (starting from a disease burden of 0.1 based on the calculation of the proportional shortfall due to disease, setting thresholds at 20.000;50.000 and 80.000 EUR/QALY for the highest burden of disease (>0.7)). Since introduction, the thresholds have not been adjusted. If corrected for inflation until today, the maximum threshold would increase to 117.000 EUR/QALY.

CONCLUSIONS: The WTP-threshold has not been changed since 2006, while having an increasingly important role in decision making, resulting in a devaluation of the WTP for innovation. In order to have innovations available in the Netherland, there is a need to evolve the WTP-threshold within the current system: considering all four criteria, emphasizing the need for periodic reassessment of the threshold in collaboration with healthcare stakeholders.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2024-11, ISPOR Europe 2024, Barcelona, Spain

Value in Health, Volume 27, Issue 12, S2 (December 2024)

Code

EE221

Topic

Economic Evaluation, Health Policy & Regulatory, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Literature Review & Synthesis, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×