A QALY Is Not a QALY When It Comes to Health Technology Appraisals of Pediatric Rare Diseases
Author(s)
Guest S1, Holdgate O1, Patel A1, Rouse P1, Bradley S2
1Roche Products Ltd, Welwyn Garden City, HRT, UK, 2Roche Products Ltd, Letchworth Garden City, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The phrase “a QALY is a QALY is a QALY ” is often quoted to emphasize that all QALYs are equal regardless of the patient accruing benefit. Consequently, the ICER threshold remains consistent irrespective of the population. However, is a ‘one size fits all’ approach appropriate when appraising pediatric rare diseases?
Aside from highly specialized technology appraisals, NICE does not differ its methods and processes depending on the population, meaning pediatric rare populations are evaluated equivalently to adult populations.METHODS: The NICE Methods Review has not produced further guidance for decision makers to account for differences in patient populations. As such, there is limited guidance on how to assess pediatric rare populations in health technology appraisals, specifically capturing clinical benefit, patient and carer quality of life, and societal preferences.
RESULTS: Alternative methods should be considered for NICE cost-effectiveness assessments of treatments for pediatric rare diseases. For instance, EQ-5D is the preferred measure of health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) in adults but no specific measures for pediatrics are recommended. There is a need for an accepted method and value set to accurately assess HRQoL of pediatrics, such as the PedsQL. Furthermore, the application of a rarity modifier in addition to the new severity modifier could allow for a greater QALY weighting for rare conditions and treatments assigned orphan designation. Lastly, a framework to assess value not captured in a QALY should be applied, allowing for the robust deliberation of additional value elements that should be factored into decision making for treatments of rare pediatric diseases, e.g. innovation, wider societal effects and patient preference.
CONCLUSIONS:
The modular approach to reviewing its methods allows NICE to pilot new approaches. The proposals described will help to ensure that decisions on reimbursing treatments for pediatric patients in rare conditions truly reflect the benefit offered to these patients.Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
HTA246
Topic
Health Policy & Regulatory, Health Technology Assessment
Topic Subcategory
Decision & Deliberative Processes, Health Disparities & Equity, Reimbursement & Access Policy, Value Frameworks & Dossier Format
Disease
Pediatrics, Rare & Orphan Diseases