Cost-Effectiveness of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (axi-cel) Vs Standard of Care for Adult Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma as 4TH or Later Line Treatment in Sweden
Author(s)
Eklund O1, Hedlöf Kanje V2, Doble B3, Cervin K2
1Gilead Sciences AB, Solna, AB, Sweden, 2Gilead Sciences AB, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden, 3Kite Pharma a Gilead Company, Uxbridge, London, UK
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) as 4th or later line (4L+) treatment for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL) versus a market basket standard of care (SoC), from a healthcare perspective in Sweden.
METHODS: A three-health state partitioned-survival model was used to estimate expected lifetime costs, life-years (LYs) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) discounted at 3% annually. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was estimated using the 36-month follow-up, intention-to-treat population from the ZUMA-5 trial (axi-cel) and propensity score weighted data from the SCHOLAR-5 cohort study (SoC) as a synthetic control arm. Extrapolations of PFS and OS used piecewise cure modelling assuming a 40% cure fraction after five years (axi-cel), and standard parametric models (SoC). Utility values were obtained from a UK study of r/r FL patients who had received 2nd line treatment. Medical resource use and 2022-year unit costs in Swedish Kronor (SEK) were obtained from the literature and Swedish price lists. Sensitivity analyses were conducted to assess robustness of the results.
RESULTS: Patients receiving axi-cel had incremental discounted LYs and QALYs of 6.00 and 4.87 respectively compared to SoC and total incremental costs of SEK 3,310,856, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of SEK 680,001 per QALY gained. The ICER was most sensitive to mean patient age, progression-free utility, piecewise cure fraction, choice of parametric distribution for OS and shorter time horizons. The likelihood of axi-cel being cost-effective compared to SoC was 99% at the relevant willingness-to-pay threshold for r/r FL (1 million SEK).
CONCLUSIONS: Axi-cel is a cost-effective 4L+ treatment alternative to SoC for adults with r/r FL in Sweden. Cost-effectiveness results were similar to a previous axi-cel indication assessed by the Swedish HTA agency (3rd line treatment for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma: company base case ICER of SEK 657,112/QALY gained).
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE536
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation
Disease
Oncology