Health Outcomes of ALK-Inhibitors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Real Clinical Practice
Author(s)
Marin Pozo JF1, Cao Viña V2, Marin Caba E3, Plaza Arbeo A2, Gutierrez Lucena L2, Contreras Collado R2
1Hospital Universitario Jaén, JAEN, Spain, 2Hospital Universitario Jaén, JAEN, JAEN, Spain, 3Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, GRANADA, GRANADA, Spain
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This research aims to analyze the effectiveness and costs associated with anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitor (ALK-i) drug therapy in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in real clinical practice.
METHODS: A retrospective observational study was designed. All patients treated with ALK-i for NSCLC from January 2016 to April 2023 in a reference hospital in oncology in southern Spain were included. The effectiveness variable was progression-free survival (PFS) and the economic variable was the cost of treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis, measures of central tendency or dispersion and frequency analysis according to variable were performed.
RESULTS: Thirty-one treatments corresponding to 21 patients (52% male) were analyzed, eight patients were treated with two or more ALK-i. Mean age was 54.1 years (range: 21-78). Performance status was 86% ECOG 0-1. Twenty-one were treated with alectinib, six with crizotinib and four with lorlatinib, twenty-one for 1st line therapy and ten in 2nd or subsequent line therapy. Ten patients on alectinib, one on lorlatinib and none on crizotinib remained on treatment at the cut-off date. Median PFS was 20.2 months for the entire population, 15.3 months [95% CI: 0.5-30.2] for crizotinib treatments, and 6.5 months [95% CI: 0-24 .8] for lorlatinib. Alectinib did not reach the number of events needed to calculate the median, the mean was estimated at 35.7 months [95%CI: 24.8-46.6], in 8 of 13 alectinib patients censored for PFS its value was >29 months (range 29.5-56.8). The total cost of ALK-i at the cut-off date was €1,906,002 and the mean cost with ALK-i/treatment was €61,484. The median treatment cost by progression-free month was €3,043.
CONCLUSIONS: ALK-i showed comparable effectiveness to that obtained in clinical trials with a clinical benefit that would justify the cost of the drug. Alectinib showed greater effectiveness than crizotinib, although the follow-up time was short.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
CO137
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy
Disease
Drugs, Oncology