Unmet Medical Need in Norwegian Clinical Practice and Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Polatuzumab in Combination With R-CHP Compared to R-CHOP in Patients With Previously Untreated DLBCL With an IPI Score of Three and Above

Author(s)

Westermann L1, Fosså A2, Ohna A3
1F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Oslo, 03, Norway, 2Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway, 3F. Hoffmann-La Roche, Oslo, Norway

OBJECTIVES: Despite the curative intent of treatments in first line DLBCL, there is an unmet medical need for patients with an IPI score of three and above. We aim to demonstrate the cost-effectiveness of Polatuzumab (Pola) + Rituximab combined with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin and Prednisone (R-CHP) against Rituximab combined with Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone (R-CHOP) in the treatment of IPI 3-5 1L DLBCL patients based on the Phase III GO39942 trial (RCT; POLARIX; NCT03274492). The relevant patient population for this new intervention for the application in Norwegian clinical practice will be identified.

METHODS: A cost-effectiveness analysis was conducted using a cure-mixture modeling approach, to compare the relative efficacy of Pola + R-CHP in comparison to R-CHOP in high risk IPI 3-5 1L DLBCL patients based on the POLARIX trial results. Norwegian clinical treatment guidelines and practices for 1L DLBCL will be reviewed and put into context.

RESULTS: In Norway, high risk IPI 3-5 patients currently treated with R-CHOP have a higher unmet medical need. Treatment of this patient group with Pola + R-CHP when compared to R-CHOP resulted in an estimated incremental cost-utility ratio of 168,171 NOK per QALY gained with incremental QALYs and LYs gained of 0.83 and 0.85 respectively based on list prices (AUP ex VAT).

CONCLUSIONS: There is a high unmet medical need in 1L DLBCL patients with IPI 3-5. The health economic analysis suggests that treatment with Pola + R-CHP in this patient population represents a cost-effective use of Norwegian health care resources at list-price.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

HTA165

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Drugs, Oncology

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×