Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy as Neoadjuvant Therapy and Continued as a Single Agent as Adjuvant Therapy for High-Risk Early-Stage Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Greece
Author(s)
Yfantopoulos N1, Athanasopoulos C2, Haiderali A3, Huang M4, Gountas I5, Skroumpelos A5, Karokis A6
1MSD Greece, Alimos, A1, Greece, 2MSD Greece, Alimos, Greece, 3Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, 4Merck Research Laboratories, Merck & Co, Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA, 5MSD Greece, Athens, Greece, 6MSD Greece, Alimos, Attica, Greece
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab for high-risk, early-stage, triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in combination with chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, and then continued as a single agent as adjuvant treatment after surgery in Greece.
METHODS: A markov cohort model with four health states (event-free, locoregional-recurrence, distant-metastasis, and death) was adapted from a Greek payer perspective over a 50-year time horizon. Utility values, efficacy and safety data applied in the model were derived from the KEYNOTE-522.Primary outcomes were quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), life years (LY), total costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICER)s per QALY gained. Both costs and health outcomes were discounted at 3.0% per annum. Deterministic sensitivity analyses (DSA) were conducted to identify the input parameters’ impact on ICER and a probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) to account for collective parameter’s uncertainty. Pembrolizumab plus paclitaxel plus carboplatin (PpC), followed by pembrolizumab plus doxorubicin / epirubicin plus cyclophosphamide (Dp/EpC) as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by Surgery; followed by radiation treatment plus pembrolizumab in the adjuvant setting was compared to PpC followed by Dp/EpC as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by Surgery; followed by placebo plus radiation treatment.
RESULTS: The total cost of the Pembrolizumab regimen estimated at €162,314 whilst the costs in the comparator arm were €107,767. The Pembrolizumab regimen yielded 17.75 QALYs and the comparator regimen 14.39 QALYs. The Pembrolizumab combination was more effective than the comparator with 2.62 more QALYs gained and 3.37 more LYs gained. The incremental analysis showed an ICER of €20,830 per QALY gained versus the comparator. The DSA indicated that the most influential parameters did not significantly change the analysis results. PSA confirmed the deterministic analysis results.
CONCLUSIONS: This economic evaluation indicates that the Pembrolizumab regimen examined in this analysis is a cost-effective option (under the 52,770€/QALY threshold) in the neo-adjuvant and adjuvant setting for TNBC in Greece.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE210
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Value of Information
Disease
Oncology