The Cost-Effectiveness of a Bimekizumab Versus Secukinumab Treatment Pathway in Patients with Active Axial Spondyloarthritis in Scotland

Author(s)

Mørup M1, Taieb V2, Willems D3, Rose M4, Lamotte M5, Gerlier L5, Thom H6
1UCB Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark, 2UCB Pharma, Colombes, France, 3UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 4UCB Pharma, Slough, UK, 5IQVIA Global HEOR, Zaventem, Belgium, 6University of Bristol, Bristol, UK; Clifton Insight, Bristol, SOM, UK

OBJECTIVES: Scottish guidelines for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) management recommend sequential biologics use and include interleukin-17 inhibitors (IL-17i) in current practice. Using an adapted version of the York Model, we estimated the cost-effectiveness of bimekizumab, a monoclonal IgG1 antibody selectively inhibiting IL-17F in addition to IL-17A, in patients with non-radiographic (nr-) and radiographic (r-) axSpA versus secukinumab 150mg including recommended dose escalation to 300mg based on clinical response.

METHODS: A decision tree followed by a lifetime Markov model represented the axSpA treatment pathway, from first- to second-line biologics disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD), then best supportive care (BSC) including 87% biologics (expert-based). Bimekizumab followed by any bDMARD was compared with secukinumab 150mg followed by a blend reflecting the recommended dose escalation to secukinumab 300mg based on European registries (57% secukinumab 300mg/43% bDMARD). Transition to the next therapy was triggered by BASDAI50 non-response or any-cause discontinuation (11%/year). A network meta-analysis provided clinical score changes and response rates. Utilities were derived from an ASDAS-CRP mapping to EQ-5D-3L. Disease management costs were estimated by a BASFI-based equation, plus biologics monitoring costs from the National Health Service of Scotland perspective (2021/22). Biologic list prices were used (British National Formulary 2023). 3.5%/year discounting was applied. Scenario (ASAS40-response, 47%-escalation) and one-way sensitivity analyses were performed.

RESULTS: In nr-axSpA, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of the bimekizumab vs. secukinumab treatment pathway was £18,390/quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Bimekizumab produced 0.73 (11.74 vs. 11.01) more QALYs for £13,404 additional cost vs. the secukinumab pathway. Results in r-axSpA were similar (ICER=£23,370; ΔQALY=0.70; ΔCost=£16,445). ICERs remained <£30,000/QALY in all tested scenarios. BASDAI50 response rate and percentage of bDMARDs in BSC were the main results drivers.

CONCLUSIONS: The bimekizumab pathway demonstrated cost-effectiveness across the full spectrum of axSpA in Scotland versus a secukinumab 150mg treatment pathway with recommended dose escalation to 300mg for inadequate responders.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

EE192

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis

Disease

Musculoskeletal Disorders (Arthritis, Bone Disorders, Osteoporosis, Other Musculoskeletal)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×