Healthcare Resource Utilization and Economic Burden of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in German Patients with Hidradenitis Suppurativa
Author(s)
Bechara FG1, Tran T2, Ploug U3, Kiri S4, Bley R5, Grellmann C6, Melnik S6
1Department of Dermatology, Venerology, and Allergology, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-University Bochum, Bochum, Germany, 2UCB Pharma, Brussels, Belgium, 3UCB Pharma, Copenhagen, Denmark, 4UCB Pharma, Slough, SLG, UK, 5UCB Pharma, Monheim, Germany, 6Gesundheitsforen Leipzig GmbH, Leipzig, Germany
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by painful skin lesions, requires frequent healthcare encounters. Here, we evaluated healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) and associated costs in German patients with HS.
METHODS: This cohort study, using claims data from the German analysis database for evaluation and health services research, included statutory insured patients with HS (defined by ≥1 medical HS claim [ICD‑10 L73.2]) between 1st August 2015 and 31st December 2016. All-cause and HS-related HCRU (% of patients) and related costs were described for the year 2017 in the overall HS cohort and stratified by comorbid depression, and potential predictors of greater disease severity: biologic medication use (≥1 biologic), and in/outpatient HS-specific surgery, in the 12 months prior to 1st January 2017 (baseline).
RESULTS: 1,986 patients with HS were included (mean age: 41.2 years; 56.0% female); 2.7% and 28.1% had baseline biologic medication use and HS-specific surgery, and 23.8% had comorbid depression. Overall, 44.1% and 6.2% of patients had HS-related outpatient and inpatient claims (98.6%/27.9% had all-cause outpatient/inpatient claims). HS-related surgery was reported in 16.1% of patients with HS. HS-related inpatient claims/surgery were reported in 15.2%/30.3% of patients with baseline biologic use and 10.0%/27.0% of patients with baseline surgery. 57.5% of 1,919 patients used HS‑related medication (including biologics [3.6%]), covering 64.8% of all-cause medication claims and 74.8% of HS‑related healthcare costs. Average HS-related healthcare costs were higher in patients predicted to have more severe HS and those with comorbid depression.
CONCLUSIONS: Within the overall HS cohort, patients with predictors of more severe disease, had higher HCRU, associated costs and overall economic burden versus the overall cohort. HS-related medication and outpatient claims represented the majority of HS-related HCRU. Recent guidelines for HS in Germany, published after this study, recommend earlier biologic use; therefore, current data may differ to these findings from 2017.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)
Code
EE258
Topic
Economic Evaluation
Topic Subcategory
Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas, Sensory System Disorders (Ear, Eye, Dental, Skin)