Comparative Efficacy of Non-Statin Lipid-Lowering Therapies in Patients With Hypercholesterolemia at Increased Cardiovascular Risk: An Updated Network Meta-Analysis

Author(s)

Burnett H1, Neupane B1, Pierre V1, Fahrbach K2, Cichewicz A2, Natani H3, Bhowmik D3, Reichelt A4, Buesch K4, Jindal R4
1Evidera, St-Laurent, QC, Canada, 2Evidera, Waltham, MA, USA, 3Novartis Healthcare Pvt. Ltd., Hyderabad, Telangana, India, 4Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: To update the published network meta-analysis (NMA) from Burnett et al. 2022 comparing the efficacy of non-statin lipid-lowering therapies inclisiran, evolocumab, alirocumab, bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe in patients with hypercholesterolemia and/or increased cardiovascular risk having elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) despite taking maximally-tolerated dose statins.

METHODS: A systematic review was conducted using OvidSP (MEDLINE and Embase), Cochrane (Wiley), Pubmed, and Web of Science databases to identify more recently published randomized controlled trials through January 2023. The primary outcome of interest was the percentage change in LDL-C from baseline to week 24 (or closest available time point). A random-effects Bayesian NMA was performed to estimate the mean differences (MD) and 95% credible intervals (CrI) for the included therapies.

RESULTS: A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis (inclisiran: 4 studies, evolocumab: 5 studies, alirocumab: 8 studies, ezetimibe: 2 studies, bempedoic acid: 3 studies, bempedoic acid + ezetimibe: 1 study). Inclisiran, evolocumab, and alirocumab delivered superior efficacy over placebo, bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe in reducing LDL-C from baseline at week 24. In particular, inclisiran provided statistically significant benefit over bempedoic acid, ezetimibe, and bempedoic acid + ezetimibe (MD: -44.24% [95% CrI: -51.84, -36.70], MD: -35.66% [95% CrI: -43.10, -28.49], and MD: -20.79% [95% CrI: -33.69, -7.98], respectively). There was no significant difference in LDL-C reduction between inclisiran and PCSK9 inhibiting monoclonal antibodies. (vs. alirocumab, MD: -1.93% [95% CrI: -8.56, 4.20]; vs. evolocumab, MD: 2.00% [95% CrI: -4.58, 8.60]).

CONCLUSIONS: This updated NMA reaffirms that inclisiran, alirocumab, and evolocumab are expected to provide similar clinically meaningful improvements in LDL-C in patients with hypercholesterolemia on maximally-tolerated statins who are at increased cardiovascular risk; while they delivered superior efficacy over placebo, bempedoic acid, and ezetimibe in reducing LDL-C.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2023-11, ISPOR Europe 2023, Copenhagen, Denmark

Value in Health, Volume 26, Issue 11, S2 (December 2023)

Code

CO1

Topic

Clinical Outcomes

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Comparative Effectiveness or Efficacy

Disease

Cardiovascular Disorders (including MI, Stroke, Circulatory)

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×