Health Economic Model for Estimating the Direct Cost Impact of Adopting an Antimicrobial Vascular Access Site Dressing in Oncology Patients With Central Venous Catheter in the UK
Author(s)
Kärpänen T1, Siddall I2, Khodakivska A3, Topachevskyi O4, Palka-Santini M1
13M Deutschland GmbH, Neuss, NW, Germany, 23M Plc, Telford, SHR, UK, 3State Expert Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine, Kyiv, Ukraine, 4Expert Committee on Selection and Use of Essential Medicines, Kyiv, Ukraine
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: To develop a health economic budget impact model to estimate the direct medical cost savings when replacing a non-antimicrobial intravascular (IV) catheter site dressing with an antimicrobial, chlorhexidine-containing IV catheter securement dressing in oncology patients with a central venous catheter (CVC).
METHODS: A static decision tree model was used to estimate the budget impact of implementing a chlorhexidine-containing dressing from a UK hospital payer perspective. The model time horizon is one year. Two types of CVC, with different incidence rates of infectious complications and cost parameters, were included. Catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI) incidence rates were 1.40 and 0.53 per 1,000 catheter days for tunnelled and non-tunnelled CVC, respectively. Local site infection incidence rates (LSI) were 0.72 and 0.19 per 1,000 catheter days for tunnelled and non-tunnelled CVC, respectively. Re-catheterisation occurred in 66% and 16% of tunnelled CVC CRBSI and LSI cases, respectively, and 60% of non-tunnelled CVC CRBSI cases. Re-catheterisation costs were £1,108 and £510 for tunnelled and non-tunnelled CVC, respectively. Treatment costs of CRBSI and LSI were £7,790 and £108 per case, respectively. Weekly costs of dressing replacement were £2.10 and £5.43 per patient for non-antimicrobial and chlorhexidine-containing dressing groups, respectively. The chlorhexidine-containing dressing efficacy to reduce CRBSI and LSI is derived from the literature (49.8%). Parametric uncertainty was evaluated with a one-way sensitivity analysis.
RESULTS: In a hypothetical oncology centre with 424 patients and 51,218 catheter days a year, the total direct medical cost savings are £222,991 (including £19,029 in re-catheterisation costs), outweighing the increased dressing replacement costs of £27,235. The intervention efficacy and cost of CRBSI were the most influential parameters identified in the one-way sensitivity analysis.
CONCLUSIONS: Implementing a chlorhexidine-containing dressing in oncology patient catheter site care is a cost saving intervention and should be considered where infection rates remain a concern.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
EE441
Topic
Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Medical Technologies
Topic Subcategory
Budget Impact Analysis, Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Medical Devices
Disease
SDC: Oncology
Explore Related HEOR by Topic