Cost-Effectiveness of Ravulizumab Compared with Eculizumab for Thetreatment of Paroxysmal Nocturnal Hemoglobinuria (PNH) in the Netherlands

Author(s)

Quist S1, Postma AJ2, Myren KJ3, de Jong L4, Postma MJ5
1University of Groningen, university medical center Groningen, Deventer, Netherlands, 2Asc Academics, Groningen, Netherlands, 3Acaster Lloyd Consulting Ltd., London, UK, 4University of Groningen, Groningen, GR, Netherlands, 5University of Groningen, Groningen, NH, Netherlands

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: PNH is a rare, acquired, life-threatening, chronic hematologic disease caused by terminal complement activation on the surface of all blood cells. The introduction of the first C5-inhibitor, eculizumab, has substantially improved the survival and quality of life of PNH patients. In 2019, C5-inhibitor ravulizumab was approved by the European Medicine Agency. Due to its engineering, C5-inhibition ravulizumab requires an 8-weekly infusion instead of biweekly for eculizumab. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ravulizumab compared with eculizumab in adult patients in the Netherlands with PNH and clinical symptom(s) indicative of high disease activity or who were treated with eculizumab for at least six months and are clinically stable.

METHODS: A Markov cohort model was developed to describe the course of PNH and subsequently model the costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with both C5-inhibitors from a Dutch societal perspective. Health states included no breakthrough hemolysis (BTH), BTH, spontaneous remission, and death. Medical (drug, administration, transfusion, BTH related) and societal (travel and productivity) costs, QALYs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were estimated over a lifetime, using a discount rate of 1.5% in line with the Dutch health economics guidance.

RESULTS: Due to its reduced administration frequency and fewer BTH events, ravulizumab was associated with lower costs (-€266,833) and a gain of 1.57 QALYs compared to eculizumab, resulting in a dominant ICER. Drug costs were the main cost drivers in both treatment, with the difference leading to a reduction of €260,587 (-4.5%) in favor of ravulizumab. Additionally, compared to eculizumab, ravulizumab reduced medical and societal costs by €1,578 and €4,699 respectively. The probability of ravulizumab being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay of €20,000/QALY was 76.6%.

CONCLUSIONS: Compared to eculizumab, ravulizumab is a dominant treatment strategy and is associated with an improved quality of life for adults with PNH in the Netherlands.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

EE233

Topic

Economic Evaluation

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Trial-Based Economic Evaluation, Work & Home Productivity - Indirect Costs

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×