Can the Promis®-29 Profile be Used to Predict SF-36 Physical and Mental Health Summary Scores?
Author(s)
Liegl G1, Fischer F2, Martin CN3, Rönnefarth M3, Blumrich A3, Schmidt S3, Rose M2
1Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, BE, Germany, 2Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany, 3Berlin Institute of Health at Charité (BIH), Berlin, Germany
Presentation Documents
OBJECTIVES: The domains of the MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) can be aggregated to physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summary scores, which are widely used measures of patient-reported health. PCS and MCS were originally derived using an uncorrelated factor model, potentially leading to problems with interpretation of results. Consequently, modified scoring algorithms for correlated SF-36 summary scores (PCSc and MCSc) have been suggested. The PROMIS-29 v2.0 is a newer generic health measure which is increasingly used as an alternative to the SF-36. PROMIS-29 physical and mental summary scores can be derived from individual PROMIS-29 domains. The objective of this study was to establish algorithms to predict SF-36 component summary scores from PROMIS-29 scores.
METHODS: Baseline data from n=713 participants of the Berlin Longterm Observation of Vascular Events (BeLOVE) study were used. We estimated seperate linear regression models, with either PROMIS-29 domain scores or PROMIS-29 physical/mental summary scores as predictors and SF-36 physical (PCS and PCSc) and mental (MCS and MCSc) summary scores as dependent variables. Follow-up data from n=194 participants were used to validate these regression models. Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to determine the agreement between empirical and predicted SF-36 summary scores.
RESULTS: Individual PROMIS-29 domains as well as PROMIS-29 summary scores showed high predictive value for PCS, PCSc, and MCSc (R2≥70%), and moderate predictive value for MCS (R2=58% and R2=41%, respectively). The agreement between empirical and predicted SF-36 summary scores in the validation sample was high for PCS, PCSc, and MCSc (r>0.80), but considerably lower for MCS (r=0.64 and r=0.71).
CONCLUSIONS: This study provides regression coefficients which can be used to predict SF-36 physical and mental summary scores based on either individual PROMIS-29 domains or PROMIS-29 summary scores. The prediction of SF-36 mental health summary scores appeared to be more precise for the correlated factor model.
Conference/Value in Health Info
Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)
Code
MSR88
Topic
Methodological & Statistical Research, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches
Topic Subcategory
Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, PRO & Related Methods, Prospective Observational Studies
Disease
No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas