Tax Revenue Gains and Societal Net-Monetary Benefit Associated With Implementing Lung Cancer Screening in the United Kingdom

Author(s)

Paquete AT1, Ryan J2, Connolly M1, Dance L2, Kotsopoulos N3
1Global Market Access Solutions, St-Prex, Switzerland, 2AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CAM, UK, 3Global Market Access Solutions, Saint-Prex, Switzerland

OBJECTIVES: To estimate the fiscal benefits and societal net surplus following implemention of a lung cancer screening programme in the UK.

METHODS: A population cohort fiscal analysis was modelled alongside a cost-effectiveness analysis of annual screening rounds of low dose volume computed tomography for lung cancer versus no screening. The lifetime risk of progression and death, and treatment costs, were sourced from the literature and projected by cancer stage at diagnosis for each cohort. Quality adjusted life-years were estimated using health state utilities from the CanCORS study. Fiscal states were based on the labour market status of adults treated for lung cancer and transitions were sourced from a multicentre cross-sectional study, depending on the stage at diagnosis and disease status. State benefits, tax revenue and healthcare unit costs were based on UK official data. Societal gains from screening were estimated as the sum of the social surplus (added earnings from employment and monetized incremental QALYs) and the fiscal balance for the government.

RESULTS: The fiscal balance was estimated as a cost of £931 million, and the tax revenue exceeded the total healthcare costs from the screening programme (recruitment, screening, diagnostic and treatment costs). Earnings from employment are estimated to increase by £1,388 million and QALY gains are valued at £7,900 million, following screening implementation. The societal net-benefit was valued at £8,357 million (£6,394 per screening participant).

CONCLUSIONS: Earlier diagnosis and longevity associated with screening keep patients economically active for longer and improves lifetime tax revenue for government. Furthermore, improvement in morbidity and mortality associated with earlier diagnosis from lung cancer screening programs generate sufficient tax revenue to pay for screening programs. Fiscal analysis of health technologies can be used to inform government cross-sectorial impact of healthcare investments and should be included in economic evaluations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HPR19

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Economic Evaluation, Epidemiology & Public Health, Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Cost-comparison, Effectiveness, Utility, Benefit Analysis, Public Health, Public Spending & National Health Expenditures, Relating Intermediate to Long-term Outcomes

Disease

STA: Genetic, Regenerative & Curative Therapies

Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×