Characteristics of Asthma Patients at GINA's Higher Steps on OCS Treatment: A Cross-Sectional Study in Portuguese Community Pharmacies (EmOCS Study)

Author(s)

Romão M1, Bulhosa C1, Mendes Z2, Sousa C3, Pereira M4, Silva G3, Bernardo F3, Rodrigues A1, Fonseca J4, Correia de Sousa J5
1Centre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaude – National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR/IS-ANF), Lisbon, Portugal, 2Centre for Health Evaluation & Research/Infosaude – National Association of Pharmacies (CEFAR/IS-ANF), Lisboa, 11, Portugal, 3AstraZeneca, Barcarena, Portugal, 4Medicina, Educação, Investigação, Desenvolvimento e Avaliação (MEDIDA), Porto, Portugal, 5Life and Health Sciences Research Institute (ICVS), School of Medicine, University of Minho, Braga/Guimarães, Portugal

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: To describe sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, treatment regimen, asthma-related healthcare resources utilization (HCRU), and disease control of asthma patients at GINA’s steps 3 to 5; and compare patients according to OCS use.

METHODS: EmOCS is a cross-sectional study conducted in Portuguese community pharmacies. Adult asthma patients (≥18 years) using (1) a high-dose ICS/LABA; or (2) a medium-dose ICS/LABA plus another controller treatment; or (3) an ICS (any dose) plus an OCS for asthma were invited to participate upon written consent. Data was collected in two parts: (1) paper-based interview at the pharmacy (patient sociodemographic characteristics and asthma treatment regimen); (2) telephone-based interview (smoking history, comorbidities, BMI, HCRU in the previous 12 months, and asthma control – CARAT®).

RESULTS: From November 3rd, 2020 to June 14th, 2021, 98 community pharmacies recruited and collected data from 347 eligible patients. Of these, 328 (94.5%) also completed the phone interview. Overall, 71.7% of the ICS/LABA treated patients were female with an average age of 59.3 years (SD=15.5). Most individuals were using a high-dose (85.9%) or a medium-dose (13.8%) ICS/LABA and 24.9% had been exposed to OCS in the previous year. Significantly higher proportions (p<0.05) of patients on OCS reported conjunctivitis (33.3% vs. 18.6%), osteoporosis (33.3% vs. 16.6%), arthritis (19.1% vs. 8.5%), and gastrointestinal disease (20.6% vs. 10.1%), compared to non-OCS treated. A third (33.3%) of OCS patients had 1+ unscheduled consultations and 32.1% had 1+ ER visits due to asthma (9.3% and 12.1% for non-OCS treated, respectively; p<0.001). Disease control was generally poor, predominantly among those on OCS (CARAT® score<25: 85.2%, vs. 72.9% in non-users; p<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Despite medium/high daily doses of ICS, many patients at GINA’S higher treatment steps still required treatment with OCS. Patients on OCS had poorer asthma outcomes compared to those without OCS in terms of disease control, HCRU, and OCS-related comorbidities.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

CO125

Topic

Clinical Outcomes, Patient-Centered Research, Study Approaches

Topic Subcategory

Clinical Outcomes Assessment, Patient-reported Outcomes & Quality of Life Outcomes, Surveys & Expert Panels

Disease

No Additional Disease & Conditions/Specialized Treatment Areas

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×