Trends in Direct Oral Anticoagulants (DOACS) Use in the Community Setting According to Their Accessibility Under National Health Basket in Israel: Real-World Data

Author(s)

Moshel S1, Gershonovich G2, Klang S3, Merling S1, Shimoni O4, Haim M5
1Meuhedet Health Services, Tel-Aviv, TA, Israel, 2Maccabi Health Services, Tel-Aviv, TA, Israel, 3Meuhedet Health Services, Tel Aviv, Israel, 4Ben-Gurion University, Beer Sheva, Israel, 5Soroka Medical Center, Beer Sheva, Israel

Presentation Documents

OBJECTIVES: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) reimbursement under Israeli health basket has been merely partial over the years. We wanted to describe DOACs use under public funding in Israel and as compared to different healthcare systems.

METHODS: Descriptive study from Meuhedet, Israel. We retrospectively identified patients who had purchased one of the anticoagulants (DOACs, warfarin or enoxaparin) at least once between 2013 and 2020 under the Israeli health basket indications: atrial fibrillation (AF), venous thromboembolism (VTE) and/or hip/knee replacement. Demographic and clinical characteristics were described. The primary outcome was the distribution of anticoagulants' use in DDDs and prescriptions. Secondary outcomes included comparison of DOACs growth rate at Meuhedet (representing Israel) to other countries (Norway, England, and Canada) adjusted per population; and annual proportion of AF/VTE patients not meeting health basket's criteria to DOACs despite being clinically eligible. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictive factors for prescribing DOACs in naïve AF patients. Finally, we evaluated Meuhedet's cumulative expenditure versus budget for DOACs.

RESULTS: 31,326 patients purchased at least one anticoagulant during study period, half of whom were AF patients. Warfarin's use dropped from 76% in 2013 to 13% in 2020. By 2020, DOACs accounted for 80% of total anticoagulants purchased. The growth rate of DOACs in Norway and England was significantly higher than in Israel (54% and 78%, respectively). No comparative data were available for Canada. In 2014, 82.1% of patients were eligible to DOACs according to clinical guidelines but did not meet the basket criteria, hence were treated with warfarin. This rate decreased over the years following the basket criteria's expansion. Reimbursement's eligibility status was the strongest predictor for DOACs initiation (OR=12.1, p<0.001). In 2020, Meuhedet's expenditure on DOACs exceeded the cumulative basket's budget.

CONCLUSIONS: DOACs uptake was considerably slower in Israel compared to other countries, with discordance between reimbursement decisions and clinical recommendations.

Conference/Value in Health Info

2022-11, ISPOR Europe 2022, Vienna, Austria

Value in Health, Volume 25, Issue 12S (December 2022)

Code

HPR9

Topic

Health Policy & Regulatory

Topic Subcategory

Insurance Systems & National Health Care, Reimbursement & Access Policy

Disease

STA: Drugs

Explore Related HEOR by Topic


Your browser is out-of-date

ISPOR recommends that you update your browser for more security, speed and the best experience on ispor.org. Update my browser now

×